IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: (with COMMENT)

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 04 July 2018 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E6D130E79; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yNRzTAY-gZoM; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x241.google.com (mail-lj1-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74459130DE1; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x241.google.com with SMTP id t21-v6so4678203lji.0; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TMLdtpVURMSOTq9z9i7cKz6H5vzyjJXGcl5wFhTw62w=; b=pA39jvjImB4GZQqtaHhDWphOrCiwh7pk08QEqEAjpIEFSppj3CiqZxqQoZ6fP+rq1B soMxrJnt2lFt0iK/NBs4FQIE0wWEVIJncM+DmkMI5cM1svQjgQf8hkYoWDhnqQj0iCBA 0ZNVUxCqOs/7nv4RhMKz0GH125wkL2acEWBkmlNgFKWBoNfBi+N/HhtfaA0ZTpHV3zta iBO7l0UcePTvKQmHgdhk9JeDFM60nTa5+Qlufy54yZYwkz6RUrg8qnec3wBSbFtDkXmf NUipjGv8EaVHQlHONX7VB74iommPQLxxq0POeR4rY6pUrsQM4/TYuXSZlW4AwbGaf/Sv vguw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TMLdtpVURMSOTq9z9i7cKz6H5vzyjJXGcl5wFhTw62w=; b=iM1ew3F0ICwRRQabREu/GHG2jiaBzbVwdJwI8UMf3QGMjB4i+2uuvgI+uVMwfvJfNT W0noeiU+QuI8qtr7rURlKIFKw2ymaSIE5gJVdp2YnwR9CIZmTCRpqz28zvYzjMZU2V4P Ob4oE5ZnfqZuK3ywGI44txuElSkZHfmvTal5wq9j7j0Sli7/HwKvp7Ekl1G2rn/bFktF qFYt3oWuv1xldmpD+DuIz9rsJkNAzixfQGjXXk8DJ2iPRDeYV6CEp4ln3up81uYQeapB CDs4ft70F51ERE7EuFBdvlNVNak1SaMntfmnRGdSuXKOr8TKW+sN23skcAlIgETnOtnQ JATw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2Q6gLZ4Vjnti7l8RwYWDpJbXs7btYnmEty7lA9S/qjmFDFPudZ HAVCCfUuvqpTpDrqpnuHTLcujGi6yXRRa8gq3Xk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpc6j33IPPYa25ftbxAXBdPpVliRzXxP5hRMIu2gWXDIz6Nuu0CqwRrBn7AzbxFZV2LBfLEBgLhKQN7rAG/8tNQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5617:: with SMTP id k23-v6mr2019620ljb.86.1530721163549; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a2e:6e08:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <153058063825.16122.16043306841510426179.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <153058063825.16122.16043306841510426179.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:19:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUpgbeyo6Z-UmACAuqa2aCg6CL0dFnnr6rE035ixA3nqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: (with COMMENT)
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint@ietf.org, Reshad Rahman <rrahman@cisco.com>, bfd-chairs@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000034202905702ecb2a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/KhxwZu7knHejVexUIZNwWyOWuCc>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 16:19:30 -0000

Hi Ben,
thank you for your review and helpful comments. I propose the following
updates:
Abstract
NEW TEXT:
   This document updates RFC 5880.

Introduction
OLD TEXT:
   The Bidirectional Forwarding Detection protocol [RFC5880] specifies a
   method for verifying unicast connectivity between a pair of systems.
   This document defines a method for using BFD to provide verification
   of multipoint or multicast connectivity between a multipoint sender
   (the "head") and a set of one or more multipoint receivers (the
   "tails").
NEW TEXT:
   The Bidirectional Forwarding Detection protocol [RFC5880] specifies a
   method for verifying unicast connectivity between a pair of systems.
   This document updates [RFC5880] by defining a new method for using
   BFD.  This new method provides verification of multipoint or
   multicast connectivity between a multipoint sender (the "head") and a
   set of one or more multipoint receivers (the "tails").

Hope these updates address your comments.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please mention the fact this updates 5880 in the abstract. Also, in the
> introduction where you do mention the update, please add a sentence or two
> that
> give a satellite view summary of what the update actually is.
>
>
>

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status