[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5880 (6926)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 06 April 2022 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384F63A120F for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 07:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6h148IJwFajK for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 07:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2773A085B for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 07:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E88341E656; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 07:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5880 (6926)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: glebs@mikrotik.com, dkatz@juniper.net, dward@juniper.net, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220406144747.E88341E656@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 07:47:47 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/Le9skjDos9EbCOmpyPpHbaa5-WQ>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 14:47:53 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5880,
"Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6926

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Glebs Ivanovskis <glebs@mikrotik.com>

Section: 6.8.6

Original Text
-------------
Set bfd.RemoteState to the value of the State (Sta) field.

Corrected Text
--------------
Set bfd.RemoteSessionState to the value of the State (Sta) field.

Notes
-----
The variable bfd.RemoteState is not defined in section 6.8.1 and is only mentioned once in the entire document. It is likely a typo and a similarly named bfd.RemoteSessionState was meant instead.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5880 (draft-ietf-bfd-base-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
Publication Date    : June 2010
Author(s)           : D. Katz, D. Ward
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG