Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Tue, 29 October 2013 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E6F11E81AB for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2s0OvhFSA4wQ for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524CE11E8171 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2832; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383049115; x=1384258715; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=dJjdRT6A8wcV3JSD1lLGT6fnj9vwSZFFAt40KKB6aQ0=; b=hydd4IvWas1pNUKlvBqqjqbmtxGlw2HhMBdG8Ruz9W4Anofty3lk3mCz 4leaZI+/8PuflJ2NRqQQQ+9lqKA9UaUs9PlzvGlHWCWoBq8Tbmb+b71KG 1J6J6e2cWxRUxzo164v4V/X3Popd1TpB9NyOL+i0l5KljGPLXpTWvD17D Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 203
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAJamb1KtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4VL8ygSUWdIIlAQEBAwFuCwULAgEIDhQkMiUCBA4FCAaHcwYNuT+MT4EvgRgxB4MfgQ0DkC2BMIJNhQ+QWYMmgXE5
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,593,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="277766862"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2013 12:18:34 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9TCIYKU010686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:18:34 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.143]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:18:34 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Subject: Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8
Thread-Topic: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8
Thread-Index: AQHO0O1YIIyKixBBUE25sptvk5frqZoL8+4A
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:18:33 +0000
Message-ID: <95067C434CE250468B77282634C96ED33363277B@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <20131024191431.GO17538@pfrc>
In-Reply-To: <20131024191431.GO17538@pfrc>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.217.145]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0D669C27-D143-4C8E-A6BE-D5E02F3F7B24"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:18:40 -0000

[as an individual]

Hi,

I've followed this document and have also read the current version under WGLC. I support its publication as it solves a real problem and is very comprehensively written.

There are one or two small nits (broken citations/references) that ought to be fixed:
http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-01.txt

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On Oct 24, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> This email is to initiate working group last call on the BFD on Link
> Aggregate Group Interfaces document:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-01
> 
> The last call will complete on November 8, the end of IETF week.  Time will
> be available during the Vancouver IETF BFD session to discuss last call
> comments.
> 
> Nobo Akiya will be serving as document shepherd (RFC 4858) for this WGLC.
> 
> Due to the small nature of the BFD working group and the fact that both
> working group chairs have contributed to this document, we have gotten
> Carlos Pignataro (cpignata@cisco.com) to volunteer to serve as an 
> independent party to gauge working group consensus.
> 
> In order to facilitate the transparency of this WGLC, please remember to 
> send all comments to the working group mailing list.
> 
> IPR declarations have been filed against this draft and the document authors
> and contributors have been polled for any further IPR.  Current IPR
> declarations may be seen at the following link:
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags
> 
> If you are aware of additional IPR against this document please declare so, per
> the IETF Note Well.
> 
> Finally, the IEEE has expressed interest in the disposition of this draft.
> They will likely provide additional commentary, if any, via the IETF liaison
> process.  This process will likely happen after WGLC concludes.  Depending
> on their feedback, WGLC may re-open to address their concerns.
> 
> -- Jeff (for the chairs)