Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 21 November 2018 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477B0128D0C; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:16:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZetZgwTbZbqQ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:16:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0279812D4E9; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F0BB61E4FB; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:15:45 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:15:45 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted
Message-ID: <20181121221545.GB23096@pfrc.org>
References: <20181029155232.GN12336@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181029155232.GN12336@pfrc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/MbkKb75uGvvL11-7cZ_nzDi-ATo>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:16:31 -0000

Working Group,

After discussing this with Reshad, the consensus is we have enough interest
to proceed in working group adoption.

Authors, please re-submit your draft as draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited.

-- Jeff

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:52:32AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Working Group,
> 
> Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for
> draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications).
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited/
> 
> This relatively minor change from the RFC 5880 spec is implemented by at
> least one vendor for static route configuration.  Its security
> considerations already cover what I believe to be the main concern with the
> procedural change.
> 
> There's a minor point to resolve regarding the document's status - currently
> Informational - with our AD.
> 
> Please indicate whether you'd support adopting this draft as a Working Group
> document.
> 
> Authors, please indicate if you're aware of any applicable IPR on it.
> 
> This adoption request will also end on Friday, November 9, IETF 103 Friday.
> 
> -- Jeff & Reshad