[Technical Errata Reported] RFC8971 (6427)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 13 February 2021 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF48B3A0FD1 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KA6g5b0kmHGX for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:50:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51C53A0FCD for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:50:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 845CCF40766; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:50:26 -0800 (PST)
To: santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com, gregimirsky@gmail.com, sudarsan.225@gmail.com, venggovi@cisco.com, mmudigon@cisco.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, jhaas@pfrc.org, reshad@yahoo.com
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8971 (6427)
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: d3e3e3@gmail.com, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20210213215026.845CCF40766@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:50:26 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/NSgZdhD3tadAMu_Ca__bacndCVQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:13:18 -0800
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 21:51:02 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8971,
"Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN)".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Donald E. Eastlake, III <d3e3e3@gmail.com>

Section: GLOBAL

Original Text

Corrected Text

This is a 48-bit unicast MAC address. It starts with the IANA OUI ("00-00-0E"). There are two instances that should be corrected if this document is revised or replaced. But I don't think this fix is worth re-issuing the document. If someone one looks this up in the IANA assignment table, it says there that the unicast numbers all actually start with 00-00-0E.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC8971 (draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-16)
Title               : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN)
Publication Date    : December 2020
Author(s)           : S. Pallagatti, Ed., G. Mirsky, Ed., S. Paragiri, V. Govindan, M. Mudigonda
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG