IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16 August, 2020)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 18 August 2020 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2853A0885 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVkmB1q_vOAO for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 353E83A0882 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id c16so21288801ejx.12 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uzaAehd98C7ss4zc48WbejGxd+AvVZ2OQ5JkTyZvfRY=; b=H3Wn3ZdIQJQLAhJ76PTK2E+j1a6TTp2ZkplwXyWPGXCOdhlhHR+DgNANUacZgUSZQ7 YFSWyp1TAOSE3yeyQFkfo8SI2g7si3uQdlDFRJ/7ATcd1tbO3jbUrSMemn2yMgJBWOpg VLGk8517WH0R+klVh7N+X6WJ1k/zhBQcJmqyY6NrhJU5STttnPVW4CP2Z8edGx+6rGHx TNc9f2inO0W4mpMxxYxSH1sxwH1ubOwuDZ/2JgkxBE/gY4nmnPHlIdzrgAJoE0SEvHlT 1hvgrLm+di4nF/TX3qpyikUgJxdQ1uX++fCwx/RTGpmiaYaTLow6qaEcCPcyjjvozHgs py+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uzaAehd98C7ss4zc48WbejGxd+AvVZ2OQ5JkTyZvfRY=; b=W05j0Y3+q1Uf5CdWMEuFlDPJKbJqBHw11r1JwhEHFkvXZuPRyO8bBPP67LtI0ex0l6 DhHxRQf9Lb3NW8u0t4xrBP9wblwA75JPgc6hQawJEYzUf17nPcEGPKv0MOTyetdaaO2X 221kCcihR1aVq4aGWQTCdC3B8l+0ORsDlEHnIdKKPsEZvQNHB1ifLRPIIW00o2f3fRyx PIt7TNrTAAMFhMkjxVXVfmbrn1AS5P3rVqOxlEiiuogg9PBj6VWIV5PQ5rozA0iM49Me hzCpCnaMtQIPwLy90uKQnpcjCNAeMSQJ73umkmEhtvaURO3Scc3vpT6MZq60HAQPiddD M8ug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oxUJlZixEGaiTIVaPdJ90zFTF8yZE8mDvri8wZmAQE5e2i/KD tvwLmRd7iHzxflyijnAyD9ctx1D69X9wWaGWtfeP+OfnY5s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsQeMziOmpJigzHm3noBKWKgqlKssh8EMMp/HN0zZ2fPm8mS7YLUP/w44he8V3Qv45+eZ5k24cNo3HmY21jyQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:11dd:: with SMTP id va29mr19970484ejb.470.1597743825397; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200804132122.GC31729@pfrc.org> <20200817204510.GC1696@pfrc.org> <BY5PR11MB4337DB9D4836800F9F91906CC15C0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4337DB9D4836800F9F91906CC15C0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:43:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMH8UYF-b+Y2jUBSS2oCL2L_FPnLFaZ4fAMin7g0TfeUYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16 August, 2020)
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027dc6c05ad23b97f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/U_WINq2EqrlHgTSK2JWEIkaGjjQ>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:43:50 -0000

Hi Les,

While shifting to Informational would be perhaps ok protocol wise - isn't
it common practice in IETF that any draft (or at least most of them) which
define a YANG model is a Standards Track document ?

I hope you are not suggesting to split this one into two :).

Thx,
R.

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:36 AM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Sorry to be tardy in responding...
>
> As I stated almost 2 years ago when this draft was introduced:
>
> a)The problem the draft is addressing is real and the solution useful
>
> b)There are implementations which have already addressed this problem with
> no interoperability issues
>
> c)I do not see that any changes have been made to the BFD protocol (e.g.
> RFC 5881)
>
> Therefore, I think this should go forward - but as Informational.
>
>    Les
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
> > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 1:45 PM
> > To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited
> (ending 16
> > August, 2020)
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 09:21:22AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> > > Working Group,
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited/
> > >
> > > With apologies to the authors of BFD unsolicited, this document is
> past due
> > > for Working Group Last Call.  The primary holdup on the document had
> > been
> > > last minute interaction with the RFC Editor with regard to its impact
> on the
> > > BFD Yang model.  That work had completed some time ago.  (The Yang
> > model,
> > > however, is still lingering in MISREF state.)
> > >
> > > This begins a last call period ending on 16 August.
> >
> > The last call period has ended with a few comments from Greg and Raj that
> > should be addressed before we continue.
> >
> > It'd also be helpful to hear from additional reviewers before we advance
> > this document.
> >
> > -- Jeff
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email