Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E65120872 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VrI-3hhaQDGm for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4B612087D for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id j191so3369579pgd.3 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=R/6j6gfQwm8c2mZM+8M+EcggN00bg9Ootxna8JLJ5XE=; b=QGl+sPUsyMyT3mS2JwHqF++EVDX2ZeLuFvAccKBWse1eUZGCj+UUAbBGlqli5/yqkP dOMcoYbIrprjynwBJWkPBONJv4ImMeIRh34nphl+0HBENvX/ywGhGzyEUJYc/bauW8Ra zPbxHXdLOibJtuFtHdgPRRn50EkY2hCH1MTYM7RYzXUoovu5qJgAbYTKR5qregnLYtEn KjyOsJNuXaCyQg4lWGDzM78RN9gfli6j3QWySVbBob8GxFCa9EERrIIB2EBbNGS94kH6 J/UfZnpvnwdWcHyN3pvVbyPOdJSkccSpT+P2Sw1OAnKUrKZoEY/AAySj2jzL2fYeBPge bExA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=R/6j6gfQwm8c2mZM+8M+EcggN00bg9Ootxna8JLJ5XE=; b=eUtN+TrApsRvgOh/egGdK4N3JYDLY4FsEHODpTS8ryB2ISicVrZPvEKGFe45AvHrf8 6Dg/gepaCIr1Jn0MrqOnf/pMhNEBC0f93RQAUuqvJnNNp5uDg2Tn2mqCqBmWTFlTLbGp AzhTGexxEWWNY+pg3AGUqxy+V9bJduBYya8eyegWgGP7KCwBwbQFGBeCdpRSx8BYCKU2 b3JRZBDV98cN2B3BmdBqg7UO7pkd2b3NzECrfGOHGl96SiCtP5GJwTmWMck+CNAiaZcN uQdR21y7piii4SvsbqLTrLTY5fTmb13xBl2l0yqTYZaci7368vA9yby0UXNAB/0FsjED b13Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWNYvZNPqjhIpWSa9JK4tgxH9C6tVKTsoOd13vKFqLOv7R/jLN9 CZpXLhB8Y1HFnpdtUFGKmR0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxRPxNRwB+z8deRCinEeruWJjS+JYaQ8X3iqIpH+31kaybyJ5nbkGiiAZUNflznwzkm4lZQog==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:2264:: with SMTP id t36mr37663940pgm.87.1568313149067; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.33.122.240] ([66.170.99.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm23620252pfi.108.2019.09.12.11.32.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <79121DF3-3BDB-401B-9759-5E72CBFE07BF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_225A5F65-63DB-4BFD-AEDB-8C2DE50880BE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:32:27 -0700
In-Reply-To: <9ECC2E5C-E87E-4859-9DA8-E8E9403DF759@cisco.com>
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
To: Reshad Rehman <rrahman@cisco.com>
References: <9ECC2E5C-E87E-4859-9DA8-E8E9403DF759@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/WU--O6LU7t5xHWH0xm3VqO8ht64>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 18:32:32 -0000

I support the publication of this draft. It is useful, and addresses a problem in a network that we know has different MTU values.

> On Aug 27, 2019, at 9:33 AM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> BFD WG,
>  
> As was mentioned at IETF105, this document is stable and there was an interop test done between FRR and Junos VMX.
>  
> Please provide comments/feedback on the document. The deadline for last call is September 13th.
>  
> Regards,
> Reshad & Jeff.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com