Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 10 December 2019 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721AF12006F; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 05:22:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan@ietf.org, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, bfd-chairs@ietf.org, jhaas@pfrc.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-bfd-?= =?utf-8?q?vxlan-09=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.113.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <157598416346.9913.15971076491241071246.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 05:22:43 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/WVOoD2Fcr8b3IFXz3KTHquYfAlg>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:22:43 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE: I didn't not see a reply to the original issue raised by the TSV-ART
review (Thanks Olivier!). Please have a lock and provide a response. I don't
think this raises discuss level but I think some clarifications would be good!

This document describes the use of BFD in VXLAN, however, it does not specify
any new protocol elements or extension. Therefore I would expect such a
document to be informational. The shepherd write-up doesn't give any additional
information about why this doc is PS.