RE: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.txt

linchangwang <linchangwang.04414@h3c.com> Tue, 12 July 2022 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <linchangwang.04414@h3c.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE858C14F73A; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I9HSxlCBC5om; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com (smtp.h3c.com [60.191.123.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCAC0C14F728; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com ([172.25.15.154]) by h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com with ESMTP id 26CEclEh033033; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:38:47 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from linchangwang.04414@h3c.com)
Received: from DAG2EX03-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com (unknown [10.8.0.66]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40840221DD02; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:42:40 +0800 (CST)
Received: from DAG2EX07-IDC.srv.huawei-3com.com (172.20.54.130) by DAG2EX03-BASE.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.8.0.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.17; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:38:50 +0800
Received: from DAG2EX07-IDC.srv.huawei-3com.com ([fe80::5de8:d5b4:2c72:6676]) by DAG2EX07-IDC.srv.huawei-3com.com ([fe80::5de8:d5b4:2c72:6676%14]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.017; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:38:50 +0800
From: linchangwang <linchangwang.04414@h3c.com>
To: "jhaas@pfrc.org" <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "reshad@yahoo.com" <reshad@yahoo.com>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
CC: "jiangwenying@chinamobile.com" <jiangwenying@chinamobile.com>, "chengweiqiang (chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com)" <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>, Lihao <lihao@h3c.com>
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHYlOv5gsFuhqrdFU6yhtNMRfh/Qa16zkvQ
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:38:49 +0000
Message-ID: <ffb86a84d8cc447dbcaa55636a7bbbc4@h3c.com>
References: <165751937170.5251.17915125635859622497@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <165751937170.5251.17915125635859622497@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.76.67]
x-sender-location: DAG2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-DNSRBL:
X-MAIL: h3cspam02-ex.h3c.com 26CEclEh033033
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/WZRoc9SG03lHpa_tGTa2_qABwZM>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:41:22 -0000

Hi WG & Chairs

  We updated the draft: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6/

  This draft describes the method of keep the path consistency of sbfd in detecting SRv6 policy through Path Segment,

  and this draft has been presented at the spring meeting of IETF113.

  The new version modified the description of sbfd packet encapsulation refer to [draft-liu-bfd-srv6-policy-encap].

  Any comments on the draft are welcome.

  Thanks,

  Changwang lin



-----Original Message-----
From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 2:03 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


        Title           : S-BFD Path Consistency over SRv6
        Authors         : Changwang Lin
                          Weiqiang Cheng
                          Wenying Jiang
  Filename        : draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.txt
  Pages           : 12
  Date            : 2022-07-10

Abstract:
   Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) can be used to monitor
   paths between nodes. Seamless BFD (S-BFD) provides a simplified
   mechanism which is suitable for monitoring of paths that are setup
   dynamically and on a large scale network. In SRv6, when a headend
   use S-BFD to monitor the segment list/CPath of SRv6 Policy, the
   forward path of control packet is indicated by segment list, the
   reverse path of response control packet is via the shortest path
   from the reflector back to the initiator (headend) as determined by
   routing. The forward path and reverse path of control packet are
   likely inconsistent going through different intermediate nodes or
   links. This document describes a method to keep the forward path and
   reverse path of S-BFD consistent when detecting SRv6 Policy.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6/

There is also an htmlized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02


Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本邮件及其附件含有新华三集团的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出
的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、
或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from New H3C, which is
intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!