IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shen-bfd-intf-p2p-nbr-00.txt

Naiming Shen <naiming@cisco.com> Mon, 09 April 2007 17:28 UTC

Return-path: <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaxfW-0000Lb-8y; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:28:42 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Haxdw-0007ne-VG for rtg-bfd@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:27:04 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaxcK-0005C3-4l for rtg-bfd@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:25:25 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.79]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2007 10:25:23 -0700
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-5.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l39HPNNK030409; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:25:23 -0700
Received: from [128.107.130.83] (naiming-linux.cisco.com [128.107.130.83]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l39HPNwn004025; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:25:23 GMT
Message-ID: <461A7703.9040400@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:25:23 -0700
From: Naiming Shen <naiming@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
References: <5EB31780BD297F46812C8F495FA08F620B9E9C03@electron.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <5EB31780BD297F46812C8F495FA08F620B9E9C03@electron.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1043; t=1176139523; x=1177003523; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim5002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=naiming@cisco.com; z=From:=20Naiming=20Shen=20<naiming@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20I-D=20ACTION=3Adraft-shen-bfd-intf-p2p-nbr-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=qqAM2iGjasbhkgE/HkiLkJzTOICoLq2ANtN7Xppgiqo=; b=VTtrNF6V+sWOYIP2yxx7+SDyNQtAM3fUR0Iz2trGp3kxHUAF+2uUqQP+mG2FBMOYicch+BGt jHGgHT+SL0PykvT0847AUzbSnuS2nmX/+15b2DLCbfp4/zq0RubAxa/p;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-5; header.From=naiming@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim5002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shen-bfd-intf-p2p-nbr-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org

Nitin,

Nitin Bahadur said the following on 04/09/2007 10:15 AM:
> If you add a new diag-code, then you either need to do it to the base
> spec or make your spec Standards track...I prefer the former.

Same here. thanks.

- Naiming

> 
> Nitin
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Naiming Shen [mailto:naiming@cisco.com]
>>Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 12:56 AM
>>To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
>>Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shen-bfd-intf-p2p-nbr-00.txt
>>
>>
>>Just to add one more thing that, even though this draft does not
> 
> change
> 
>>anything in terms of BFD base spec, but this scheme does generate
> 
> unique
> 
>>error conditions, such as detection of multiple peers over a point-to-
>>point
>>interface. If the implementation does bring the session down, it
>>needs to
>>report this with a new DIAG code to reflect this error. Although the
>>detection
>>mechanism is out side the scope of this document. Thanks to the folks
>>brought this to my attention. Will fix.
>>
>>thanks.
>>- Naiming

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email