BFD queries
kalpana.yenishetti@wipro.com Tue, 25 October 2005 05:16 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EUHB2-0007AP-Ay; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:16:48 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EUHB0-0007AG-1o for rtg-bfd@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:16:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA20590 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:16:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: kalpana.yenishetti@wipro.com
Received: from wip-ec-wd.wipro.com ([203.91.193.32]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUHNn-00062X-3q for rtg-bfd@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:30:05 -0400
Received: from wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (localhost.wipro.com [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94204205E1 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:34:02 +0530 (IST)
Received: from blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com (blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com [10.201.50.92]) by wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AAF20519 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:34:02 +0530 (IST)
Received: from hyd-mdp-msg02.wipro.com ([10.150.49.99]) by blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:46:24 +0530
Received: from HYD-MKD-MBX01.wipro.com ([10.154.50.182]) by hyd-mdp-msg02.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:46:26 +0530
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5D922.F1CA7560"
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:44:15 +0530
Message-ID: <BD6DEA8C77182E4586B6BE33532EA48D38CBCB@HYD-MKD-MBX01.wipro.com>
Thread-Topic: BFD queries
Thread-Index: AcXZI+ej2ZcNkaY9Qd6sEr3B02YDrw==
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2005 05:16:27.0042 (UTC) FILETIME=[3FFAF020:01C5D923]
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b8f3559805f7873076212d6f63ee803e
Subject: BFD queries
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org
Hi I have following query from the BFD draft 1. When a BFD session is established between two nodes in a network, and if one of the system sends a BFD control packet with POLL bit set to change any the Min Tx/Rx intervals and the receives response to the previous BFD packet. This could lead to situation where sender assuming his request for configuration change for Min Tx/Rx intervals is declined. 2. If the choosen transport protocol for BFD transmission is UDP, the FIN bit set packet is lost then there will be discrepancy the configuration between the configured nodes. Thanks & Regards -Kalpana
- BFD queries kalpana.yenishetti
- Re: BFD queries Dave Katz
- RE: BFD queries kalpana.yenishetti
- Re: BFD queries Dave Katz