Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 October 2018 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F2213104F; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hcuJ0JH0wMr3; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc2f.google.com (mail-yw1-xc2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D998613101C; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc2f.google.com with SMTP id j75-v6so4055653ywj.10; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=QC4VFN4na4MUjCvVPP+w2sWkdnBWZhap0dO/6z6u4cU=; b=aYjQ8M/aQavoApNgggat6Hfs1ri1Ea641aDGpAveo/+o/6716lvVixyacuaZIQkioz ilvi/nUlaB368xPbwkfK/4qgGkyJySeQTvjNh64ENl6YhOeAJkYcrZ6z9ysqtGOi7EbO tSAatcd0BGxCXy8cpiKGWAY4ET8Ctx+92kMd5/6ubgyHXj6U07FLE9glIm2QjcQmyciZ e+4c6mz0DZXNGxLsxlv1k9StdKj6JKch283Ce2TOIeaHg1MZAfA8EaW0MpMK13MfxfsW Txl/xPpfghWXwf8Ba3+qnHAMp+sF9G1cDgdntU3x8iUapD91VuRCZ4Vz1ynPrnrCEfLA b4OQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=QC4VFN4na4MUjCvVPP+w2sWkdnBWZhap0dO/6z6u4cU=; b=YIrcwKqCGn3LhgghEHk2d0gyQTEHyBtI7AKl8Uncz2QkcGL+BA6SL922LS+2ZsnAO0 F8L/+TsHvtyvGeM/TvhNgU9WLb8fFsj2Rhac3bLfe03/VUIDqPq8ykuXcZ9qyxpJ7MYs dUP6TZyFSQd2Qxw+ZOnBXtGh4GO8qKNX67ccy4cZB3BZLJf8x1T3ZASEQEsut5+dsraJ vaE9c1eGmpMTKDz2fnCF6f2zBY5GsNIjRg+6xieenPswhs/eTfY9nGPIb6/IevmeepsD yAeiOpiRKY+PWdna7ehS7Wy5ea0u1RLTdp27bd0lKeL6Y/86nnnj1U6a5A4bjQZ12kA4 WawQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gL3xi/R7orkKleOTBIfvCV2Y++n5Sh0caKhNOXcdioTLM/pyCel N0OWSpeIYfNITWGFja1aq2k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5exsNofMCgPiXCk+1d+Ni9QSk+1mtoaHs9qaPaIJLwcACL36mR1nmlh3JSEOatLXoyP6e/jgw==
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d514:: with SMTP id x20-v6mr209486ywd.130.1540850678058; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.5.194] ([50.235.77.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 200-v6sm5314869ywq.97.2018.10.29.15.04.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:04:20 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
Cc: "=?utf-8?Q?rtg-bfd=40ietf.org?=" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "=?utf-8?Q?draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited=40ietf.org?=" <draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <5895b6eb-32bf-4e64-801c-681a7f490f52@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <1259DC2C-93CE-4B9A-867E-681B02971079@cisco.com>
References: <20181029155232.GN12336@pfrc.org> <1259DC2C-93CE-4B9A-867E-681B02971079@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 5895b6eb-32bf-4e64-801c-681a7f490f52@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5bd783f2_4365174b_1491"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/_6T38-K5Sa_pGJpQO5dALofAUEo>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:04:41 -0000

Yes/support
Makes sense, in Redback times we had a design to build it that way (never did though), not an IPR disclosure .

Cheers,
Jeff
On Oct 29, 2018, 2:32 PM -0700, Naiming Shen (naiming) <naiming@cisco.com>om>, wrote:
>
> Support as a co-author.
>
> Regards,
> - Naiming
>
> > On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> >
> > Working Group,
> >
> > Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for
> > draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications).
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited/
> >
> > This relatively minor change from the RFC 5880 spec is implemented by at
> > least one vendor for static route configuration. Its security
> > considerations already cover what I believe to be the main concern with the
> > procedural change.
> >
> > There's a minor point to resolve regarding the document's status - currently
> > Informational - with our AD.
> >
> > Please indicate whether you'd support adopting this draft as a Working Group
> > document.
> >
> > Authors, please indicate if you're aware of any applicable IPR on it.
> >
> > This adoption request will also end on Friday, November 9, IETF 103 Friday.
> >
> > -- Jeff & Reshad
>