Re: Rtg-bfd Digest, Vol 178, Issue 5
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 25 February 2021 03:54 UTC
Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D5B3A0EF4 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:54:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dKZ-3rgnScbE for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDAD33A0EEF for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id l2so2934185pgb.1 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:54:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=mdESLPl52+UidY0hiWBTzlYp7J3pVQREyp0CCiZf8uM=; b=ED2s5jYNHIv9rN7vj1/n5Y6un1SeWuV1BZcfsswK26cb3ONIkiWCDhOsUxSy3tfZht QbQRC2HtxcTNz0FK4C9u+ijDf5jHJdd314+aUBn+sOQR6A9KGEZVDZeHZRXpJaqRL9Td MaLzopBTujxGI0ooppAc5eM74YDYJsyk0fxoy0ym40ehDBQx3ONmGiqI+n7Zjq9QYX4g KBxCv6pjmQsQiBTo0tPn/LizL4W2fU/es/SQ0Zk787lILobi16Gf4GXbGb1ChHq8eML/ wnWoAChoajsLIUJ3Ki6gMaTRtZR/cgs20qa2kmEmbnQgoF6dcgju41n2EAQn4y1Uac/d vKyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=mdESLPl52+UidY0hiWBTzlYp7J3pVQREyp0CCiZf8uM=; b=QFoXu1ucVspSAAOki+4i+sj1SKH4tCHV8KJwHPUp7Ugn50EpoA36xJlqBCfWvkSsev VwbO8oEvHPQ+kdUvaVdAKGW2reXR8iDIKSPQPCu/bTfvXqHlx6xN2jeCkbavrMUUCqKS YqrQGuZswd13qrxH+XcXqSTbXBxZa3he0I8Czm2S5kgwWtghBH4EjdnEYKDmYQbKqX/8 QmBvxwHORKgH4PU9DSgoq8W3Bw37BPRwVkVW32cn8OuGcVmfgK/nV2gkSC+5zsAu0FhB 43M4ODNGaHX0/NasZnwckcxn1xSiZtw92kMGfKb2f5yXOlRAiGqifv3riMcstA71NDLh ymUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lW3XpHIf8GO3EcfzcyD8RTqXhu67ocCKje5E+Vfjwy4m8etK6 2TrbYMGbO/hytQ8me+jsTsU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2x8ilrOHTEpZqkZ5d8iZDnt9VE/e0pE7jO0DXRUVB2cZ8cfG6nlYqn8Mt4nP9NmEh7YGW7g==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9488:0:b029:1ee:16f0:5246 with SMTP id z8-20020aa794880000b02901ee16f05246mr1065988pfk.14.1614225274160; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:b0d8:8e1:aa8d:ddb2? ([2601:647:5600:5020:b0d8:8e1:aa8d:ddb2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14sm4306243pfy.55.2021.02.24.19.54.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:54:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <1A8F1E82-4F2F-42F8-BD4B-5CF5E7027AAA@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4169E8C8-28B8-4705-9627-7A2741322A39"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: Rtg-bfd Digest, Vol 178, Issue 5
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:54:32 -0800
In-Reply-To: <18D0D533-4735-4EC9-A569-4C1960A1CF2B@yahoo.com>
Cc: Albert Fu <afu14@bloomberg.net>, "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
To: Reshad Rahman <reshad=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <6016FF99010E05DC00390001_0_4903@msllnjpmsgsv06> <18D0D533-4735-4EC9-A569-4C1960A1CF2B@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/__JWDbyyzVVAxVm8SW-orRNPV7Q>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:54:37 -0000
Hi Reshad, > On Feb 23, 2021, at 7:15 PM, Reshad Rahman <reshad=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi Albert, > > Apologies for the delay in replying. > > I believe (no hat) that there is value in adding counters to expose drop-related info. We should look into augmenting the BFD YANG model, not sure whether we should add that in the stability draft… I would like to hear from the WG. +1 Done. However, the document now needs a YANG Doctor review. Do you think you can take a quick review of it? > > Regards, > Reshad. > > From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Albert Fu (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)" <afu14@bloomberg.net> > Reply-To: Albert Fu <afu14@bloomberg.net> > Date: Sunday, January 31, 2021 at 2:06 PM > To: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org> > Subject: Re:Rtg-bfd Digest, Vol 178, Issue 5 > >> Hi, >> >> 1. Re: New Version Notification for >> draft-ietf-bfd-stability-07.txt (Reshad Rahman) >> >> This feature is good to have. As a matter of fact, we have been trying to get vendors to expose BFD counters as we know links from carriers do drop packets without any indication of errors, and the basic send/receive counters are not reliable indicators, since the timers are randomized up to 25% lower. >> >> The draft talks about geneation of diagnostic info but no details. I would think syslog is not practical for large network. What do you think about mentioning keeping counters of missing seq numbers, and have these counters exposed to telemetry/snmp? This would be very useful to us. >> >> Thanks >> >> Albert Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
- Re:Rtg-bfd Digest, Vol 178, Issue 5 Albert Fu (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)
- Re: Rtg-bfd Digest, Vol 178, Issue 5 Reshad Rahman
- Re: Rtg-bfd Digest, Vol 178, Issue 5 Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: Rtg-bfd Digest, Vol 178, Issue 5 Reshad Rahman