RE: Status of WGLCs
"Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com> Tue, 14 July 2015 03:49 UTC
Return-Path: <venggovi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739C31A8AA7 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HgS85ZYGn-zH for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408C31A8AA6 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1129; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436845794; x=1438055394; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=59DJZiyjpWCmK9n4VJiq0LYIU6MiJ9BjUB65U14tSOY=; b=O2yTdPwZ2Uj/pZ0X9P8yThxze9JTBPWmYTjL2/qoochihY0UnOE8nd3A ed17SkSLo6aMp4PAOSOXXcd1aBAMlFZwgdoMSTy1xjlNoNhBiiqJJ4e04 jwdbaffuy8k7Tt0FLJPSKxh+i9uO6QwdSzRs4jrpy16n5vcpdj70gk94r I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BKAwDWhaRV/51dJa1bgxOBPQa7RAmHawKBRjgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCMBAQEEOjoFDAQCAQgOAwQBAQsUCQcyFAkIAgQOBQiIJsxaAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4tMhFUxBwaDEYEUAQSUMQGNQ4QYkxQmg3tvgUeBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,468,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="168279996"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Jul 2015 03:49:53 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6E3nrTj032644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:49:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.97]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:49:52 -0500
From: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Subject: RE: Status of WGLCs
Thread-Topic: Status of WGLCs
Thread-Index: AQHQk85Wu8lUWPnme0apZb1UMB2UdZ3aqAzQ
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:49:52 +0000
Message-ID: <315041E4211CB84E86EF7C25A2AB583D5459776E@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com>
References: <20150521135940.GA25032@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150521135940.GA25032@pfrc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.49.140]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/aRkgq6UAWxiJtXjtdvNEKMvUpEQ>
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:49:56 -0000
Hello Jeff, I have re-submitted the document after addressing comments from Santosh, who has also acknowledged support for WGLC. I believe all authors should have submitted IPR disclosures as well (please let me know if anything is missing). Can you please progress the document to the next stage if you deem it fit. Thanks Prasad -----Original Message----- From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 7:30 PM To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org Subject: Status of WGLCs The S-BFD documents - use cases, base and IP - have passed WGLC. However, there are authors who still haven't made their IPR attestations. Thus the S-BFD documents are in a holding pattern until we get these last attestations. For draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5884-clarifications, we still haven't gotten IPR attestations from Kalyani Rajaraman and Sam Aldrin. More importantly, no one has actually stated that they believe this document is ready to progress. Santosh P K has also noted some items that must be addressed before the document can progres. -- Jeff
- Status of WGLCs Jeffrey Haas
- Re: Status of WGLCs Manav Bhatia
- RE: Status of WGLCs Santosh P K
- RE: Status of WGLCs Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)