IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 22 March 2021 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3553A0BE3; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMuY2CnZcrkC; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 847F13A0BDE; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id g15so11746888pfq.3; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Xfewt96ii9s4pDxgx0JkLLh+/sKIy2HtGa5KBD7/d7Y=; b=Nl9YWHZSbn8QeR9CShw9x/Eejno0sKzaZhE1DcZnJpMyIoNW8lgvsYnigspOP3BhFm OrWJdl9r7HZbNwNPi9HpG0U/OIVYoy5+kxtz27wNINXTyTir3KAeVUOrHlpnHr5fXgdc zjTWt4wL+9dHzg4vIc+K5c2NbscAmLZeqrZlwz8N4t6+bgIsrshvZCcLj7XVxVO2tAtR 9t+67Q0xgTf3oSl4YdCDDrCsryWA4AuUDppBN0OE4q8WaJdMemg3nueCiiScPn4BZsy2 brvFFAM8eXFnY3GXqE5nyiYuH/NsQ74kXISvPHl1MkAfs/gZdLVPnT20J9Fi2KjH5gTE K5PQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Xfewt96ii9s4pDxgx0JkLLh+/sKIy2HtGa5KBD7/d7Y=; b=Ug8y1h+73HEV0OkleBSc/1sLIsSiArUYV1ANeMFkqGd5aRoDBQC0DxQw9v4ssBD8ZV zWLVbySsYMQdwiX9+oTjkfZNbHCUhO3e/LU/icGfb/pLOSEniC9TsuLET/jSoJLghHdF Mc2gapI6XUyFm2yJ+ypKjZjn1239DDiCHc+ZUmBsZ+x6Y7PpJVLuXC9UnkK2tixA4qtg ZFtXOt5fRjGuOoOTcjBMUbL6vFBZ0bcFtY6PWEvmoDszXRSSxIzehwI3IV8QEp0laH4n 8Ao3Xq0r/GOh770Z8QQBfoLhWRKdKewfFadvTzHbxcI6xoa0LWbip6vANn3nDf17k/+d 0Wdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532YWvUDRQFNMRAqFM0Wv7PGGCD9ZlZ2/EZv4+ujQ7w74vKL5pPO Py2hJT5pF2BstATWPkyuzg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5M/huPCDeEiVt+V5zt1KR9Mjp6gV8oQ+uPq0AYTqpST5oYUTYE0WO4wt/HIL4dN1w7A0mzA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:2d45:: with SMTP id t66mr899506pgt.449.1616441370059; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9702:c61:9892:3e30:9499:f1c3? ([2601:646:9702:c61:9892:3e30:9499:f1c3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e11sm14768748pfm.24.2021.03.22.12.29.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5546DFAC33AD1952F8CC96DDA2659@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:29:28 -0700
Cc: Reshad Rahman <reshad=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <40AB32BD-3138-460F-B385-B8BA6D1EA8FB@gmail.com>
References: <47E2C01B-AE6F-4697-9C49-3A2EEAB78F93.ref@yahoo.com> <47E2C01B-AE6F-4697-9C49-3A2EEAB78F93@yahoo.com> <DB7PR07MB5546DFAC33AD1952F8CC96DDA2659@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/aRogzNOtkwZpUqmKRDgGI8crhP4>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:29:37 -0000

Hi,

I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Reshad Rahman <reshad=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
> 
> BFD WG,
> 
> Draft minutes have been posted @ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
> 
> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
> <tp>
> 
> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can progress.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> Copying the LSR WG.
> 
> 
> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
> 
> Regards,
> Reshad.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email