Re: WG Adoption request for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 26 October 2018 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA65F130DF9 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95JWEyN6TVXw for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA9A41298C5 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f3-v6so1507104ljk.9 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3UNNCArtjDnigPVYYPJ8pCfAvmP5lPedRY+p3LOmcmw=; b=MB7C9ISlD1Cyoj2ifmfxprKsgaFkqvbGXXukn0y0AcuJ4xArmI3LIOa2PUPf6VrBS7 moL9q8bJGXEE3gC17egaOScrDBLx909qWb33Bupk11IQgFzVkhxqFmmCY/6nb4KKrp7P vL4rrdiEhz+2K5Pi6uJYKgJfv6g62rlj7xORErO4F+3af/e9mQDr6dgr2B4INgSPMiCY Zvtg3CePgk+EIRqByZceK2hHIpRjPn86zULDojbW1oHqT2y3TsV7LOKV/bksqOXxC168 iqg+7ZY+ZMM4cfAY2ZtTOrGc9VpQXocZQC+PaVYKr0Lm2hqmrBdaxcUzkpLtpGgUAiKr /Eog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3UNNCArtjDnigPVYYPJ8pCfAvmP5lPedRY+p3LOmcmw=; b=Ci3YMYhVgFJZHn1+MTNQFbg74eDNwqgKww/pImKq2pTe7/+zTRjocV3lYdEXsPyz+O VU0k8XvDN55spppIHXzrXZ1bjFs0JTrd0v0W1YQf0ZXv0gm0CE5evjhmpA7z1wPTE4tY gkQuoyf9OT4qwxuseM+6m4EQ19Q+xoIb5fkqy5klE/nFyi818ROcyEJ4f0+RVE426t5V khBoBzQOtVrHeCUMc8FBBF5DF/7BtkPYRdoqhrABn/AKhVbDJrkj+nUv6BFRx31phZ2z YD4fY4jrlAuvgxmuDd0nRgfPfIDwfk/R4MFtNbJvICMgMKiV9/TMc6a0Tas3G+r8QubK K5Ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLzZna0HNgXwPpTJQFr5Zn6fLQ5FrAUc39pPsG1R9rETjjGuAMv Gem1GGtDjBzZBlVHaWMFEHploorUZTiRIq7aHks=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eJIWrsMGm11Cz2lCgSKlcG04WBOuBGhW1JmqXr+0aEDBneEUsLxCPFnubzb8Lveo704tdnzH4GeMPQMudoZlc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4611:: with SMTP id t17-v6mr2665051lja.92.1540567442735; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181017222431.GK17157@pfrc.org> <201810200959390293198@zte.com.cn> <75D9EDEC-68A6-4053-8931-39CFE3CCEA29@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <75D9EDEC-68A6-4053-8931-39CFE3CCEA29@cisco.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:23:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXrB7=0m4xdm0LhOkvbXDezHDYZsX-OUFZiaYWxjgh_8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG Adoption request for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn, rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002d47a30579234f76"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/bDm361UaxYVallxrQd9akj6BPiA>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:24:08 -0000

Hi Carlos,
thank you for your interest in the draft and the questions. Please find my
answers in-line tagged GIM>>.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:04 PM Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:

> Xiao,
>
> Scanning through the draft, two questions:
>
> 1. What is the underlying mechanism to check liveness such that Demand can
> be used?
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5880#section-6.6
>
>    Demand mode requires that some other mechanism is used to imply
>    continuing connectivity between the two systems.  The mechanism used
> GIM>> The Poll sequence may also be used as such, and
> draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail is the example of how the Poll
> sequence is used in BFD Demand mode.
>
> 2. Is this draft testing liveness of a path or a node?
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand-03#section-3
>
>    In this state BFD peers MAY remain as long as the egress LER is in Up
>    state.  The ingress LER MAY check liveness of the egress LER by
>    setting the Poll flag.  The egress LER will respond by transmitting
> GIM>> BFD does not differentiate between the path and, to certain extent,
> the node. From RFC 5880 Abstract:
>
   This document describes a protocol intended to detect faults in the
   bidirectional path between two forwarding engines, including
   interfaces, data link(s), and to the extent possible the forwarding
   engines themselves, with potentially very low latency.

>
> Thanks,
>
> — Carlos Pignataro
>
> On Oct 19, 2018, at 9:59 PM, xiao.min2@zte.com.cn wrote:
>
> I support WG adoption of this draft. Use of the demand mode for p2p LSP
> monitoring is feasible and required.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Xiao Min
> 原始邮件
> *发件人:*JeffreyHaas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
> *收件人:*rtg-bfd@ietf.org <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>;
> *日 期 :*2018年10月18日 06:24
> *主 题 :**WG Adoption request for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand*
> Working Group,
>
> The BFD chairs have received an adoption request for
> "BFD in Demand Mode over Point-to-Point MPLS LSP"
> (draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand).
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand/
>
> The adoption call will end on the Friday after IETF 103, November 9.
>
> Note that there is are existing IPR statements on this draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3301/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3104/
>
> Please indicate to the mailing list whether you support adoption of this
> draft.
>
> -- Jeff & Reshad
>
>
>
>