RE: WG adoption poll for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Thu, 11 January 2018 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE54B12EBE2; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:00:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.78
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=eci365.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MPaMQx4mMrjv; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8742C12EBE0; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [85.158.139.163] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-9.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 84/88-26136-438975A5; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:00:36 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA1VTa2wMURh1Z/Yxmg6329LPpn7Y9WjRVlHZxFu CCqI0Uuo5W2N3Y3daM4tK/KhXRRtCSKurWmQjTalH01JVpSuiVtMiKKJUu42qqsdiSddjZme9 7o8v537n3DPnm9xLkZoPKi3FZtlZnmOsOlWIYmLM1+GxE4+kpo370EAYyp1bDbfuPkcGr/8iM tzt6SMNNfX6Gcqky45WdZLT+Y1IcjhuEMlkmtLCGTOy1irNvcf3kZnteSgr+5xfmY169qJcFE IpcA4JBb6jpLTR4IMElDS+UsubNgR1T3YRuag/pcJToeJ0q0rCEXghHC7OU0oiEh9F4HxXLBI UFY4nw6PCMFkzBbY37VTLeDy0tdQhCSvwCCj0nVVKmMYr4WdfR6CvwcnQfKOVlHB/vBh+PKgO aBAeDD73mUAGEkfCU09JAAPG4KxtJmU8CF53/AjqjfCi8wSS+8OgdJczqB8K90vyAiMDriSg4 vvp4OE4qDr4NnhgIbiuH1JLswDWQ2XXKrndiKDm2WQZj4ZGvyfouQHqyw8EsRWeee6pg/4kvD /pC/pHwZeqYkImHqqgvnOvUp44HRqKvIoDaKzjn+FkzMGZO7XIEfhJYXC70KNwiJlIHAPnauJ lyTA4nPdSLeNo2F10TP1v/zhSl6FogeU3s3xsgiHOyFtMZruNsVhjE8YlxtlYQWBMrJUxCnHp GbYKJF6wfuKqRjsuzXOhIRShG0TXmlLTNAOMGeu2mhnBvIbfZGUFF4qiKB3QZIHIhfGsic1ab 7GKt/Q3DVSoLoLWSjQtZDI2wWKSKTeaT+V/7Mghqcr212K9HqiPu96INf9Uj9SXqkbBZXCsNp JWSRZYsjBv4v584PdLuI+GasNpJEbWhGayvM1i/5/vRpEU0oXTTfmiS6iFs//J0S1GJMSIzRe WShHtzF9Km40SvXzb/K5F7o3nl89M0Q/u/XR1pLAm5bPmyaxUhXvUCm/yTFXpGPOkgQ25EfrC 2avOtniWs9suFXSz3OKKOQ8yo9sn9TL2kMd9dPw1Lt2Xk113ZH8RXlDu9+9xR7iivOVfrqzWJ 1bXzSWWLOsqit7yvsyZsr1lx4TnqvDpndNuunbrFIKZSRhN8gLzCyPud5kEBAAA
X-Env-Sender: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-188.messagelabs.com!1515690032!37164907!1
X-Originating-IP: [52.41.248.36]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.4.45; banners=ecitele.com,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 6960 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2018 17:00:35 -0000
Received: from ec2-52-41-248-36.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com (HELO EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (52.41.248.36) by server-3.tower-188.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Jan 2018 17:00:35 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ECI365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ecitele-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=ZpMWAwEiQ/LuWWJ0qPBGzCr0rcW88AR14wtLuoo7tLE=; b=fHxIBE5oLPePG4sCKg86YA2eicOuyLY4oA6uPO7b7aTUWbuls7a/PyGhThi8kiqMmz/FqyCD08wWCNMhVa6xTRKB3STMDdEfT8S3ASIm0Y0qRto3aOkjIZ6kHbo9DHGPlATMOmzPBFYkeZpScFdndExR78aI6PCcWwH5Iz8odqs=
Received: from AM4PR03MB1713.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.167.88.15) by AM4PR03MB1714.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.167.88.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.386.5; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:00:31 +0000
Received: from AM4PR03MB1713.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9114:d58a:a3a7:602e]) by AM4PR03MB1713.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9114:d58a:a3a7:602e%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0386.008; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:00:30 +0000
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: "draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p@ietf.org" <draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p@ietf.org>
CC: Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "vinesasha@yahoo.com" <vinesasha@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: WG adoption poll for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p
Thread-Index: AQHTillH+p5HfdDsLk+ztXX1cGt5RaNu3yhw
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:00:30 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR03MB1713EAEFE31431C1B4BA45EF9D160@AM4PR03MB1713.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAHzoHbvEUAqRL-dBxMQ2KxcVVMkJCpxPQ1bA84U0KT2YiW9mNw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHzoHbvEUAqRL-dBxMQ2KxcVVMkJCpxPQ1bA84U0KT2YiW9mNw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [109.65.31.232]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM4PR03MB1714; 7:BJGGqyo/2lXBsxtYKHGz2Rxw5Je6sdCWou0Kh+XAYqLZBn1YF5jG1Zo5MtRIDSMpYkQBodfFUE5ByWT8XOLbPPpP2qWfC0RBSB7uXqrgimmlx/lvgEa2XawZ4jNrPhJWMNdmavlgufrqYlk/edxTdBSlWa+7g4J/cp8EbZTbG5J+TVwplQxoL+eiYUeujIEsMwVM8OjfN9LXf5ykUxxlFZYSoASpnFg3vuFXuw/pVXhI2FwBcMVMj+QN1BM+ay6C
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: da20c3bb-23cf-4875-18f5-08d55914d263
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534020)(4602075)(4627115)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:AM4PR03MB1714;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM4PR03MB1714:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM4PR03MB171400755E0B1BB64A175D3D9D160@AM4PR03MB1714.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(120809045254105)(21748063052155)(279101305709854);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231023)(944501075)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041268)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:AM4PR03MB1714; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:AM4PR03MB1714;
x-forefront-prvs: 0549E6FD50
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(396003)(39380400002)(366004)(376002)(346002)(54094003)(13464003)(199004)(189003)(252514010)(51874003)(53754006)(102836004)(2906002)(3846002)(2501003)(790700001)(6116002)(5250100002)(7696005)(6506007)(76176011)(53546011)(5640700003)(33656002)(99286004)(54896002)(55016002)(66066001)(6306002)(6916009)(106356001)(2950100002)(2351001)(5660300001)(105586002)(5630700001)(97736004)(14454004)(39060400002)(478600001)(6246003)(6436002)(606006)(316002)(2900100001)(54906003)(229853002)(9686003)(7736002)(236005)(53936002)(68736007)(25786009)(966005)(81166006)(3280700002)(86362001)(74316002)(81156014)(72206003)(230783001)(8676002)(8936002)(4326008)(3660700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM4PR03MB1714; H:AM4PR03MB1713.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ecitele.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 3xVJKaKdg9Vkxrrb+d8U8PLfPYbYN7qJ93/11lWb9d6Pwgue1mQQAew4QLWjY73XAZCMfuN2nUJBZO0BK74oCw==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM4PR03MB1713EAEFE31431C1B4BA45EF9D160AM4PR03MB1713eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: da20c3bb-23cf-4875-18f5-08d55914d263
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jan 2018 17:00:30.5939 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM4PR03MB1714
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/c5LdUmKvjBzF9P37iWVV4W8sdek>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:00:45 -0000

Hi all,

I have several questions regarding the draft that I would like to clarify before providing any firm opinion regarding its adoption.



1.       The draft seems to deal just with VRRPv3 (RFC 5798) while completely ignoring VRRPv2 (RFC 3768). I wonder if this omission is due to some technical issue; if not, do the authors plan to extend the draft to cover also VRRPv2 in future? (The context for this question is that, AFAIK, VRRPv2 is more widely deployed for IPv4)

2.       Neither RFC 3768 nor RFC 5798 do not mention a “Master Down event”; rather they speak about “expiration of the Master_Down_Timer”. However, the draft uses the term “Master Down event” several times. Can I safely assume that it is the same as “expiration of the Master_Down_Timer”?

3.       While neither RFC 3768 nor RFC 5798 mention it, most VRRP implementations support tracking mechanisms that result in dynamic change of priorities of VRRP group members. The draft does not discuss what happens when priority of one of the group members changes. E.g.:

a.       Do the backup member that experiences such a change immediately send a new Backup Advertisement?

b.       Is the “Critical Path” re-estimated each time this happens etc.

4.       Both VRRPv2 and VRRPv3 support no-preemption mode. Please explain what happens if this mode is set in a VRRP group member whose priority becomes (due to dynamic changes) higher than that of the current Master?

5.       Suppose that the draft is used with VRRPv3 for IPv6. Is the Source IPv6 address of the Backup Advertisement packet a link-local address of the interface via which this message is transmitted? (This is explicitly specified in RFC 5798 for the VRRP Advertisement message, but not specified in the draft)

6.       In the scenario above, will the 1-hop IPv6 BFD session use link-local IPv6 addresses of the VRRP Master and its primary Backup? (I assume that the answer is positive, but it would be nice to see this in the draft and not to leave it for the implementers to guess).



Your timely feedback would be highly appreciated.



Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,

Sasha



Office: +972-39266302

Cell:      +972-549266302

Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chris Bowers
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:23 PM
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>;; rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p



RTGWG,



This email starts the two week WG adoption poll for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p.



https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p/



Please indicate whether you support or oppose having RTGWG work on this topic with this draft as the starting point.



This WG adoption poll will end on Thursday, January 25th.



An IPR poll for this draft was conducted last month.



Thanks,

Chris



___________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________