Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 17 December 2019 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9665B1200C3; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 06:38:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan@ietf.org, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, bfd-chairs@ietf.org, jhaas@pfrc.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Subject: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.113.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <157659353960.26404.15894323280421366020.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 06:38:59 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/croLC2qIu71kceTqF2g6bGfUwVI>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:39:00 -0000

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Benjamin and Eric's DISCUSSES - I considered holding a DISCUSS on the
"loopback address" terminology and formatting (which was also noted in the
excellent OpsDir review by Jürgen Schönwälder), but think that Eric can carry
it.

In addition, like Jurgen, I think it would be helpful to have pointers to where
terms are defined - the "Terminology" section isn't really terminology, but
rather just an acronym expansion section.