[Technical Errata Reported] RFC7880 (5211)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 16 December 2017 20:28 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8E5126C89 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:28:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QTevQ4lygXO for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617E912706D for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 55553B80CC9; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:27:55 -0800 (PST)
To: cpignata@cisco.com, wardd@cisco.com, nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com, manav@ionosnetworks.com, santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jhaas@pfrc.org, rrahman@cisco.com
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7880 (5211)
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: gregimirsky@gmail.com, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20171216202755.55553B80CC9@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:27:55 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/dI5Y2YXBG3kACEjX5vIZgSJHVw4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:13:20 -0800
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 20:28:26 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7880, "Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5211 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Section: 6.1 Original Text ------------- o bfd.SessionType: This is a new state variable that describes the type of a particular session. Allowable values for S-BFD sessions are: * SBFDInitiator - an S-BFD session on a network node that performs a continuity test to a target entity by sending S-BFD packets. * SBFDReflector - an S-BFD session on a network node that listens for incoming S-BFD Control packets to local entities and generates response S-BFD Control packets. The bfd.SessionType variable MUST be initialized to the appropriate type when an S-BFD session is created. Corrected Text -------------- o bfd.SessionType: This is a new state variable that describes the type of a particular session. Allowable values for S-BFD sessions are: * SBFDNone - indicates that the BFD session is not of S-BFD type. * SBFDInitiator - an S-BFD session on a network node that performs a continuity test to a target entity by sending S-BFD packets. * SBFDReflector - an S-BFD session on a network node that listens for incoming S-BFD Control packets to local entities and generates response S-BFD Control packets. The bfd.SessionType variable MUST be set to SBFDNone when a BFD session other than S-BFD. The bfd.SessionType variable MUST be initialized to the appropriate type when an S-BFD session is created. Notes ----- The original text leaves value of the new variable bfd.SessionType unspecified if the type of BFD session is other than S-BFD. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7880 (draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Publication Date : July 2016 Author(s) : C. Pignataro, D. Ward, N. Akiya, M. Bhatia, S. Pallagatti Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7880 (5211) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7880 (5211) Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7880 (5211) Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7880 (5211) Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)