Re: WGLC for BFD Multipoint documents (last round)

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <> Sat, 16 December 2017 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D482127601 for <>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:03:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nhU4MqyfNhWw for <>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:03:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 281BE124D85 for <>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:03:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=6749; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513396981; x=1514606581; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=OQweBf0bNyzPRFlQoqWAAdpesKcMx2CEVHzBTza/sAI=; b=jRzTBP1SAL/Xo6AmKl6lhDuO2/+8SDc2VVTlR7jB56ELK87s7OsQ7T1c adkfUnTvokfjU2LSOLgA4Zt1WzYm3ozioGLssJQ2MTfcvOHxraGJkzPgL j8m8DtC0SHw/MsK/LHTi6PWGL6tbEt8DH5Chzeeo66xZxD7tMkou8esqu s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.45,408,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="44832815"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Dec 2017 04:03:00 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBG430jO023979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 16 Dec 2017 04:03:00 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 23:02:59 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 23:02:59 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <>
To: Greg Mirsky <>
CC: Jeffrey Haas <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: WGLC for BFD Multipoint documents (last round)
Thread-Topic: WGLC for BFD Multipoint documents (last round)
Thread-Index: AQHTdDbMbGs0pYB83U6MWgKspk/ChqNFQ0wAgAAZy50=
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 04:02:59 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_746F74E27DFC41A7879F4054CF95475Cciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 04:03:03 -0000

Hi, Greg,

It seems the comments regarding bfd.SessionType are not addressed:


Sent from my iPad

On Dec 15, 2017, at 5:15 PM, Greg Mirsky <<>> wrote:

Dear All,
attached please find diffs and the updated version of the draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail. All changes are editorial. Please review changes and share your comments.


On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Jeffrey Haas <<>> wrote:
Working Group,

In an attempt to give our AD a holiday gift, we're at the point where we may
now work to conclude WGLC on the BFD multipoint documents.  We did one pass
of last call June-July of this year, and held off approval pending review
from ALU who has an implementation of the base spec.  ALU has since
responded that they're fine with the contents.

To provide the working group one last opportunity to review the documents,
we're running a final last call and will send off the changes to our AD

The prior WGLC thread is here:

The documents are here:

The intent is to conclude this WGLC at end of year.

-- Jeff

<Diff_ draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-05.txt - draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-06.txt.html>