Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

"Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com> Mon, 29 October 2018 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <naiming@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884CF131027; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CD0yvaseb7ha; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B75E130FBD; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1041; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540848724; x=1542058324; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=py7juuvs9Rakn+RzofkOmp67Gcp8wD58M7KP9GgAu+E=; b=TAvfQsW6Q73TCUHuFNee5N+nRL8iTxoJa1d+m6F8iCA8tlcJZgzMert3 Nw4ajcs7S49a0nlnq2hLJDz4A9tJfXch6DHdEdLEj8lo5iZkwDIEo05U6 YNr0dyZvUmcF3ir5aG9H1CAhPawexs8g0hFdZ7S/VunLIBY1boWhmqLRO 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AFAAANe9db/4sNJK1kGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGCBGZ/KAqMA4wZgg2XIIF6CwEBI4RJAoMtITQ?= =?us-ascii?q?NDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhToBAQEBAgE6PwULAgEIDgoeEDIlAgQOBYMhAYF5CA+?= =?us-ascii?q?rT4Q+QIUYBYtnF4IAgTgfgkyDGwIDAYFdgzWCJgKJKpVfCQKGaIoaGIFShHe?= =?us-ascii?q?JfoxwigUCERSBJh04gVVwFWUBgkGLGYU+b4wGgR8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,441,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="192841171"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Oct 2018 21:32:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9TLW32D002305 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:32:03 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:32:02 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:32:02 -0500
From: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
CC: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited@ietf.org" <draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted
Thread-Index: AQHUb5+E62EdVh/GO0aQbosNraNnAaU3EjqA
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:32:02 +0000
Message-ID: <1259DC2C-93CE-4B9A-867E-681B02971079@cisco.com>
References: <20181029155232.GN12336@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181029155232.GN12336@pfrc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.208.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C2C1D9AAF92A974EA9A5B81D37FAE3B4@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/fzwDxEbF6ONsrMlS470f3fUWlVw>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:32:07 -0000

Support as a co-author.

Regards,
- Naiming

> On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for
> draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications).
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited/
> 
> This relatively minor change from the RFC 5880 spec is implemented by at
> least one vendor for static route configuration.  Its security
> considerations already cover what I believe to be the main concern with the
> procedural change.
> 
> There's a minor point to resolve regarding the document's status - currently
> Informational - with our AD.
> 
> Please indicate whether you'd support adopting this draft as a Working Group
> document.
> 
> Authors, please indicate if you're aware of any applicable IPR on it.
> 
> This adoption request will also end on Friday, November 9, IETF 103 Friday.
> 
> -- Jeff & Reshad