Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-10.txt
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 21 July 2020 01:28 UTC
Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFA63A1277
for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id vfKp7eme9cbz for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31E103A1276
for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id t6so11184779pgq.1
for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=ZZTHVAhUKA5zrpvQjEHF8ACLvB5CpSgnD7fePyPEkQE=;
b=hGzNQukoxsdat0DJl8BT15zGWVvedtqU96rG5rs0ObRQKHhVUdg6vjBMh+n4iTDCaS
9jJgDNuFkKPnMz9/kOqc8HbMeojLtnqAfCRY92EaKzGyGTNURtea38cEKz12cUovPLen
xgFiGBqfnLlGl2K5UwNnwF/jvGzJ1Dgrk3unn0s28d8pZLZNpPya6Q6OYtWzGylVeYgf
Cq4nMpYLOFZGNS/tUXufZ6VVRgoBur2GG/aQ5jQILUKMs4TSxIxdGon70/AxkfWk/aAz
gA7KOhv3RuUCRvE7QAmgDiWksCJ0Ns2Mp+JNEbQzEHEdGyPsOhI2iN632zuoTQ4JHPM2
vSew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=ZZTHVAhUKA5zrpvQjEHF8ACLvB5CpSgnD7fePyPEkQE=;
b=RkUBIXY3jzGAAVjC08fLv+3mV2J6pKK8moNMiCoFRhOIO9NVZsdXUKrKFDCV6qgdWQ
6/C3n0CqasJ7JqBMIIekx501cBKaDwK1DiAtT7mHOgEp0PVuqJANNuVTWAQqV8W+c3ua
w3Cw9auApFUjxPrHtMuFRnaBWVhm89IRvv5wlrCSWXC2rQLqRKz5hGXQNHawiqY+A/g+
3y+h/5Gu7VLjXyW2JV3dZZ7ko7yFTzPPhSc39Sy3+C6j803bHKiQQJsHxdoPM8xRedB5
507zQeB2qYc+h1bt0bQDFGvbKrjpr2Tb033Y71G73LwjaxnFAHZS6PbGwXvJN6v0HF5K
Rm3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532y9ibo/23LSo6ZMlshNtUFY/H3LVq1GLCzvPY/etDW3ZVwu0HV
YPhyy+BPIj2+PcpXBIZRhBHDl3Rh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYhIdqBxOE7+ncJBMNYYr9t/YwmDDZGHbmwHWEqohXdv5JwQF+2ueWWw2Ioc7FO3bFAmOu4g==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5a1a:: with SMTP id o26mr20387748pgb.420.1595294928778;
Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:5112:8afe:15de:4a73?
([2601:647:5600:5020:5112:8afe:15de:4a73])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y198sm18322169pfg.116.2020.07.20.18.28.47
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.6\))
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-10.txt
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200721004857.GB31779@pfrc.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:28:46 -0700
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2C632683-57D0-4E40-809E-6A907B38CDB5@gmail.com>
References: <159466724499.14803.15233027731222579839@ietfa.amsl.com>
<FC5206AF-9CDB-4CC2-9967-B4BF5A17141B@gmail.com>
<20200721004857.GB31779@pfrc.org>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/gtgc5j3VF9G4BQbA9x-VInxznJc>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>,
<mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>,
<mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:28:50 -0000
Hi Jeff, > On Jul 20, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote: > > Mahesh, > > While reviewing version -10, I had the following questions: > > For the state machine changes, in the Init->Init state, we have NULL auth. > While this is a "boring" transition, it's also happening at a very slow part > of the state machine; timers should be once a second. Is there a strong > argument to use NULL here? Not particularly. The reason to choose NULL was because of the (limited) impact it would have. But if the WG feels otherwise, I can change it to Auth. > > In section 3: > : Sequence Number: The sequence number for this packet. Implementation > : may use sequence numbers (bfd.XmitAuthSeq) as defined in BFD > : [RFC5880], or secure sequence numbers as defined in Secure BFD > : Sequence Numbers [I-D.ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers]. > > In the core BFD spec, it distinguishes between occasional and meticulous > modes and uses different code points to determine what you do. I suspect > your intent is that we always use meticulous mode here? Yes, the intent was meticulous. I can clarify that. > > -- Jeff > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 01:56:14PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection WG of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : Optimizing BFD Authentication >>> Authors : Mahesh Jethanandani >>> Ashesh Mishra >>> Ankur Saxena >>> Manav Bhatia >>> Filename : draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-10.txt >>> Pages : 8 >>> Date : 2020-07-13 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document describes an optimization to BFD Authentication as >>> described in Section 6.7 of BFD RFC 5880. This document updates RFC >>> 5880. > > Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authenticat… internet-drafts
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Manav Bhatia
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Manav Bhatia
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Manav Bhatia
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authent… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)