IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re:WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023)

程伟强 <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Wed, 22 March 2023 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72A6C151540 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1FEFVNx8VO2 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33ADBC14CE4A for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.95]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee8641aa7d3acb-a5d9e; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:01:39 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee8641aa7d3acb-a5d9e
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com ( [10.2.54.104] ) by ajax-webmail-syy-appsvrnew08-11018 (Richmail) with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:01:38 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:01:38 +0800
From: 程伟强 <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2b0a641a9ef4c94-0002e.Richmail.00004050346431316931@chinamobile.com>
References: <20230321160207.GA7334@pfrc.org>
Subject: Re:WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_74814_1322821419.1679468498914"
X-Priority: 3
X-RM-TRANSID: 2b0a641a9ef4c94-0002e
Encrypt-Channel: web
X-RM-OA-ENC-TYPE: 0
X-RM-FontColor: 0
X-CLIENT-INFO: X-TIMING=0&X-MASSSENT=0&X-SENSITIVE=0
X-Mailer: Richmail_Webapp(V2.4.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/i8vwGvhPb6-vnb81qf4BG4YUFmk>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 07:01:54 -0000

Hi Jeff,

Thanks a lot for your detailed review and comments.

We will give you feedback soon.



B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng




 
----邮件原文----发件人：Jeffrey Haas  <jhaas@pfrc.org>收件人：rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>抄　送: (无)发送时间：2023-03-22 00:02:07主题：WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023)Working Group,https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/05/The authors of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo have requested WGLC.The draft, in my opinion, is in fairly good shape.  However, since itfunctions via looping packets back to itself and trying to exercise thenormal RFC 5880 state machine behaviors to a large extent, the draft coulduse very high scrutiny for several matters:- Does the state machine behave appropriately at all stages?- Are the descriptions of the values of the BFD fields clear in all cases?Please supply the authors and the Working Group with your feedback.The intended finish date for this WGLC is 7 April, 2023.  This is one weekafter the end of IETF 116.Note that Reshad is an author on the draft, so I39ll be handling the full setof review and shepherding work.-- JeffSubject：WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023)Working Group,https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/05/The authors of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo have requested WGLC.The draft, in my opinion, is in fairly good shape.  However, since itfunctions via looping packets back to itself and trying to exercise thenormal RFC 5880 state machine behaviors to a large extent, the draft coulduse very high scrutiny for several matters:- Does the state machine behave appropriately at all stages?- Are the descriptions of the values of the BFD fields clear in all cases?Please supply the authors and the Working Group with your feedback.The intended finish date for this WGLC is 7 April, 2023.  This is one weekafter the end of IETF 116.Note that Reshad is an author on the draft, so I39ll be handling the full setof review and shepherding work.-- Jeff

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status