Re: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: (with COMMENT)

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mirja,
my apologies for the delayed response and inaccurate reference to my
response to Olivier's comments. I've responded to his comments on June 17th
with this email
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/yCJ3ItIjT5j5rSgrargnQM-Sx-0.
Please let me know if I've missed to address, through two updates to the
document, any of Olivier's comments.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 9:13 AM Mirja Kuehlewind <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> I also saw that you replied to Carlos comments but I don’t think I saw a
> reply to Olivier’s initial mail. The link you’ve sent below seems also a
> link to one of Carlos replies.
>
> See here for Olivier’s review:
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07-tsvart-lc-bonaventure-2019-05-31/
>
> Mirja
>
>
>
> > On 10. Dec 2019, at 17:41, Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mirja and Olivier,
> > I apologize that some of Olivier's comments were not addressed. I've
> responded to Olivier's detailed comments in
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/?q=Tsvart%20last%20call.
> I much appreciate your help in identifying the remaining questions and
> comments.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Greg
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:22 AM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
> > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > UPDATE: I didn't not see a reply to the original issue raised by the
> TSV-ART
> > review (Thanks Olivier!). Please have a lock and provide a response. I
> don't
> > think this raises discuss level but I think some clarifications would be
> good!
> >
> > This document describes the use of BFD in VXLAN, however, it does not
> specify
> > any new protocol elements or extension. Therefore I would expect such a
> > document to be informational. The shepherd write-up doesn't give any
> additional
> > information about why this doc is PS.
> >
> >
>
>