Some draft-ietf-bfd-base-06.txt Queries
aaron_castellino <nelson.aaron.xx.castellino@ericsson.com> Tue, 18 September 2007 10:39 UTC
Return-path: <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXaUG-0000fu-VX; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:39:24 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXaUF-0000fk-Fk for rtg-bfd@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:39:23 -0400
Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXaUE-0007R9-Kx for rtg-bfd@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:39:23 -0400
Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces@nabble.com>) id 1IXaUE-0002Nj-4W for rtg-bfd@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:39:22 -0700
Message-ID: <12754310.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:39:22 -0700
From: aaron_castellino <nelson.aaron.xx.castellino@ericsson.com>
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19559_451764.1190111962137"
X-Nabble-From: nelson.aaron.xx.castellino@ericsson.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d2b46e3b2dfbff2088e0b72a54104985
Subject: Some draft-ietf-bfd-base-06.txt Queries
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org
Just some implementation queries! 4.1. Generic BFD Control Packet Format =========================== 1. Desired Min TX Interval This is the minimum interval, in microseconds, that the local system would like to use when transmitting BFD Control packets. The value zero is reserved. Q. Why is the value zero reserved. What happens if I get a packet with this value as zero. Should it be discarded. if so then why is it reserved? 2. Required Min RX Interval This is the minimum interval, in microseconds, between received BFD Control packets that this system is capable of supporting. If this value is zero, the transmitting system does not want the remote system to send any periodic BFD Control packets. Q. Shouldn't it be that if this this value is zero and demand mode bit is set then the transmitting system does not want the receving system to send packets. Along with this, if demand mode bit is not set, shouldnt the received packet be discarded.What is the requirement of a sending system to send a BFD control packet with this feild as zero in Async mode. 6.6 ==== 3. Note that if Demand mode is enabled in only one direction, continuous bidirectional connectivity verification is lost (only connectivity in the direction from the system in Demand mode to the other system will be verified.) Resolving the issue of one system requesting Demand mode while the other requires continuous bidirectional connectivity verification is outside the scope of this specification. Q .if a system wants to support only Asyncronous mode and will discard demand mode packets? What happens in this situation? Since now each system can independently support demand mode, wouldnt it be a problem for systems not supporting demand mode. I asume in this case the system in this case cannot even inform the other station that demand mode is not supported 6.8.3 ==== 4. If either bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval is changed or bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval is changed, a Poll Sequence MUST be initiated (see section 6.5). In any case other than those explicitly called out above, timing parameter changes MUST be effected immediately (changing the transmission rate and/or the Detection Time), and a Poll Sequence SHOULD NOT be sent. Q. Considering the above 2 statements what are the cases in which timing parameters can be sent without poll bit set? It seems there is no such situation except for detection time change which does not require poll bit to be set. 6.8.7 ===== 5. A system MUST NOT periodically transmit BFD Control packets if bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval is zero. Q. Should not this be only in demand mode? In Async mode how is this possible?What is the purpose of this? In Async mode if this is true, how does the state machine work, timers, intervals etc? Regards /Aaron -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Some-draft-ietf-bfd-base-06.txt-Queries-tf4473305.html#a12754310 Sent from the IETF - Rtg-bfd mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Some draft-ietf-bfd-base-06.txt Queries aaron_castellino
- Re: Some draft-ietf-bfd-base-06.txt Queries Dave Katz