Re: draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan IESG status

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 17 June 2020 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD613A0A80; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2uiGIbIAsv_x; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 542FB3A0AA3; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id f185so2726634wmf.3; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AEgjKbEhQ89bS2JE5lF0Oq9lBgf5DYnNT+CLfkekZtM=; b=gx/4coyACugQL+4ow9bP1tMVlleunjKJR04qHuH5iZqPLarIdd+h7J6w6PGphpHeb5 3FjcT0SbX0cizVPhNE64Lr390cvZbDHE6VGlk8KEZeBVo+AkJ1Mkpejmu2hl/+tAg9Z6 QwD3q2P15WOZ4JRteXa+kD8Jx2+RY79us6UIRU5qQvgQKCMfzp929/tF3IoO+YYoHWAx S39umdwwUEipJ8yBlFYyo35FGiaG3CXmPlWpm14IOwOs+MpiUFRU4DPFi9Ja+1moMHsW VJtRsZ0zKYf3nogGJlkeO6iR2Nq0qZjhazs1/q/CiiNNjp2DZyLstpMjdugVmawWB6wd baDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AEgjKbEhQ89bS2JE5lF0Oq9lBgf5DYnNT+CLfkekZtM=; b=S4dual7GL4N+Nu7kxmRPDUFji4Bhgnzk33tVXtNRNOkWfeogT38mPUG1o/N2SZdYT9 ig/GiwijIeR1f3TTu6V9IZ8OjC0v6xUQ8lRNRoxEZ8wn8pOTk/U9iWtbxtfIyviM/s6h Q5I/WZ2Uq+NxqWdPY/89+yiVkpW/xDNComct1PZBbjxyuCD2vw8/vpxVEzxbk+F9yMlP wWXu+yxFWGOtbuF+cInMiT+L+KI5zR7pa6chwNqDtNBHvZlSBMv+Nbx75vaCdMWCkqNh qMETBOFmkM7XxQtVygzLpBCUuFU9AHENoi8SSWG/+JyY0XWViBrrzA0vui0PD5SmLsqS az2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JVswv7Psrv9ZWMk87n4Ygo/Q6cAQn3IRaBGuDHqxAUJjWo2fR HMWiIXiaVDGrU6PTtXnIoLgRu8u7Duis7NwdcH6aE84P
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzliTMYBUYaSVjeORScqI3rAE2aTHbHtZX3jqS0jNIUH/BiAtJ20AfEahNXOBJbpWvmU8d40rFx7fuJlaI7/s=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6744:: with SMTP id b65mr9401569wmc.170.1592411863468; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:37:42 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200616211057.GA21373@pfrc.org>
References: <20200127221705.GB17622@pfrc.org> <20200616211057.GA21373@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:37:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxsPKM+jnLESOh=C+xyrw8+iGySXuMDo3TFTdU2RgUkDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan IESG status
To: iesg@ietf.org, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan@ietf.org, rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, bfd-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/nrNjmDdmg6EhMB3XJNcuhPDIxQ0>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:37:59 -0000

On June 16, 2020 at 5:01:57 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:


Hi!


...
> > Open Issue 1: Discussion on TTL/Hop Limit = 1
> >
> > Proposed Action: Greg has proposed text he will send to the working group
> > suggesting GTSM procedures be utilized. The expected concern is how this
> > impacts existing implementations.
>
> This issue is resolved.

As I had mentioned before [1], the use of 255 should reference
rfc5881: the requirement is one from the base spec, not a new one
here.

Suggestion>

   TTL or Hop Limit: MUST be set to 255 in accordance with [RFC5881].


I am clearing my DISCUSS.


Thanks!!

Alvaro.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/aiJW3KjYevY83wEDwVj488FSVl0/