IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan, ending November 9

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Fri, 26 October 2018 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D2E130DF6; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrD-2XBjdioc; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4750124BAA; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14210; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540589315; x=1541798915; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=EWONpaFSiAuiUEzEKotIYyiLQYC5joS1aUnNTJ5+YBk=; b=llsrQ8yJ9L9lPRMlDNcFzeH36I5IwXegRlgn5ABfIHNr4Z2xOsuAPCxu +soc4Z3aOZ55xMzUo5sCqxpCGN/m7UJWLLthyITx4xp7skxSVcv+3JlIK 2ji8vK13pi9ky6J5axmP4a8qvB/LCdI5O83NtJ4ef7t2ZuLLAVkozN3VI s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAACBhdNb/4ENJK1gAxkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEHAQEBAQEBgVEEAQEBAQELAYENd2Z/KAqDa4gYjBmBaCWIfYhVhUsUgWYLAQEjhEkCF4MBITQNDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhToBAQEEHQZLCxACAQgRAwECKAMCAgIfERQJCAIEDgWDIQGBHUwDFQ+mfIEuhCwBEUA9gkANghMFi2cXgUE/gREnDBOCTIJWRQIDAYElIBcYCQEmgj0xgiYCjkaGIIlrLgkChmeGb4MnGIFShHeJfIkygzt9hi2CVAIRFIEmHTiBVXAVOyoBgkE+iluFPm8xi26BHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,429,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="192226348"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2018 21:28:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-019.cisco.com (xch-rtp-019.cisco.com [64.101.220.159]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9QLSYiT015955 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:28:34 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-019.cisco.com (64.101.220.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:28:33 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:28:33 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan, ending November 9
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan, ending November 9
Thread-Index: AQHUZmbVu5wLZbumgE+1dc2w905hkqUrlGQAgAWkqQCAAM+ngIAAUz2A
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:28:33 +0000
Message-ID: <F48D1DB4-DF87-4E55-9938-E53372E0D2F1@cisco.com>
References: <20181017221400.GI17157@pfrc.org> <CAF4+nEEuKDRBFky7ypkGAEziTs5VwbKBTpDkgV07sx0unj-q6Q@mail.gmail.com> <0851BB5B-6141-4B02-B6BB-0D34F407C53E@cisco.com> <CA+RyBmVk1jAe6-sbHfa6BF=d6ztbWgkQ9xGZ5cMD8SgLGwrW8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmVk1jAe6-sbHfa6BF=d6ztbWgkQ9xGZ5cMD8SgLGwrW8A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.116.132]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F48D1DB4DF874E559938E53372E0D2F1ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.159, xch-rtp-019.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/ojCMInghHdWYmglOFVtNnWzwFRM>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:28:38 -0000

Thank you, Greg and authors.

Have a great weekend!

Thanks,

— Carlos Pignataro

On Oct 26, 2018, at 12:30 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Carlos,
thank you for your support and the comment about the reference to BFD for Multipoint Networks draft. You have a point, and I agree that the sentence and thus the reference can be removed altogether. I'll check with other authors and will update the group accordingly.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:07 PM Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <cpignata@cisco.com<mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>> wrote:
+1. Support publication as this is useful and technically sound.

I do not understand why  [I-D.ietf-bfd-multipoint] is a Normative reference, or frankly a reference at all. I do not think there’s a need to reference every potential thin outside scope.

Thanks,

— Carlos Pignataro

On Oct 22, 2018, at 9:56 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com<mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>> wrote:

I support publication of this draft. It is a useful OAM building block.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com<mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>


On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:14 PM Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org<mailto:jhaas@pfrc.org>> wrote:
Working Group,

This starts the Working Group Last Call for BFD for VxLAN.  This last call
ends the Friday after IETF, November 9.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/

Please comment whether you believe this document is ready to advance or not...

There is currently one IPR statement on this draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3193/

Authors, please publicly state to the mailing list whether you know of any
additional IPR that impacts this draft.

-- Jeff & Reshad



----- Forwarded message from Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>> -----

Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 07:47:19 -0700
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>>
To: rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>>, Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de<mailto:marc@sniff.de>>
Cc: bfd-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:bfd-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-03.txt

Dear All,
the new version is to address comments from Marc (big thank you, Marc).
Please note that IDNits err on downref to the normative reference
to Informational RFC 7348.

Regards,
Greg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email