RFC7130 - IPv6
arch 25 <arssraj2208@gmail.com> Wed, 03 May 2017 11:03 UTC
Return-Path: <arssraj2208@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E022126579 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 04:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m8ERpzZyO2xf for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 04:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCE5D129504 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 May 2017 04:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b204so17368660oii.1 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 May 2017 04:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nWXHuSSY9qDVmpC356uhIrN9hNFaioZI5YNbQsTssgA=; b=hVB3DBbuOyYkURmts9hjRXrNhLFIms/Z/NVHDP31u+/Z8eE6+859PgUEsfaIalAOgg H8JhdcvTWkdbyJnJShfZO7BNWJEKQbSlSBuggpPthOBjJU6v2yk+G92SJOYNLFoPYrD9 EVPZrkM8+epbqn2BGeqzzSdinsQbxqDuaU/mNl/FVi4HEoVdtijYzdRDtXWnvYjXvqQs m80+jBVQ5mzIvZRcfWvZTjtgkw0gX3EOHGUmDqY6JrNTtztmhR/WL5dImi5pu4iUddzq qXf0kNSn1NHapNNWpJMZ/16/mNNvWTBs+QPFsxzSA6BfW8h9tkC9+luYK3jRbPEcMQZ1 jAWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nWXHuSSY9qDVmpC356uhIrN9hNFaioZI5YNbQsTssgA=; b=ZvD43fElMusKlESygBzRXf/NHRi8q6hQ+urSFK3eSQaKfdrJKXFXeS8cpxq0OfPoXP e9pIhzorwrap6r78HSQWfKyef3otB37D0yVRpvHhpAwLmZYYm3K3AFipTwjMD6NNbYCl 5CvdUWfXOtFVfhR+m1zCAsb7hbTSINZIj67JHh+GqPfLFHaqVeHRv5bCz+GC8czML4Dk Q3+T2Q3NMFNtUDxIWmoA7Hhm3/jY8WjysorKtIxBKAr/VqtMcmg3ICYZ8zHmRDUxhO8v iw7972C9JAESQk+jpuAyLDgl4Pfva/CJQmhAB7W8gU5R9MjaNIVuRj0vabHm+HHeM/Vx MMvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6V9MbhcEQjMVO5u04uTcTGi23MZQ7qMqGz7SHuBDAS+6tXyFgL eVKMWn6BaeeW/W2E67lkGnJxBPrDDq7+hshxTA==
X-Received: by 10.202.77.149 with SMTP id a143mr12586368oib.90.1493809243041; Wed, 03 May 2017 04:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.244.137 with HTTP; Wed, 3 May 2017 04:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: arch 25 <arssraj2208@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 16:30:42 +0530
Message-ID: <CANwM20whj-cgUJhhPHSqYPD8MXUJRtxYFVwBieGXqq=3n3dkqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RFC7130 - IPv6
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c15f5a4b379f054e9c916d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/ony7umHn3O1thTzmlZO6kb_3KmY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 May 2017 06:36:19 -0700
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 11:10:43 -0000
Hello WG, Problem Statement: =============== IPv6 DAD detection prevents bringing up of BFD-over-LAG session. Description: ======== If BFD-over-LAG feature with IPv6 address family is provisioned on LAG interface before the aggregated member link is active, BFD session fails to come UP, since IPv6 global unicast address remains invalid as DAD detection is not triggered on LAG interface. I have few clarifications on RFC7130 to address this issue. 1) Can the BFD packet sent to UDP port 6784 with a source IPv6 address set to 0::0 ? 2a) Can destination IPv6 address be set to loopback ::1/128 ? 2b) Should destination address mandatorily be a global unicast address configured on peer interface? Thanks & Regards
- RFC7130 - IPv6 arch 25
- Re: RFC7130 - IPv6 Marc Binderberger