Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-stability-09.txt

Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com> Sun, 11 April 2021 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <reshad@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8743A184A for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 11:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUZbZ5z5mhMX for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 11:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic312-21.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic312-21.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.128.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 391903A1849 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 11:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1618165200; bh=m/HOOIW0q4vGtARvQsqDNs5iKJWNhhbadjzcNS0g26o=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=i+tVOtmEPAGfSiN2HaiGlss3T4E/sVmnlM+o806QL8MdlGyR3I71FHBWurh+vo73TtP15DvnEfAx7+4XX0PuMu4QIKGvRQDNXJnELeO6IVnarRUd6yc2ZFkdBSEy3EU6c92x+4etEzNDe99ieNtvkPDlbKIXgOyakCJNW4yh+L2Z2H/DQs66nu3BsOLP1vkFohA/Np2AnPMY6BUed1CK/YbrTKH44/8yJeWXN/IJy3BUlGXpoK14XdTqt/4X/sm5FnVU1EL2eGmta4440IvqoB+RKUMGitaYKyiVX3vpj73Fj7NiIHGZwA1x+Asw8fvLE29HAK7NA0nk58EC4eBTcw==
X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1618165200; bh=f51UjE1dIAgrQMauYkZbh8BzWdTYosxlalya75A9dbQ=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:Subject:From:To:From:Subject; b=K/U6G6axXNjvJxlLpm5C6IwlHivR3jJ8/m/wJwzqJ/QVCuek9tT3mtVedHwjGpOLLRWCBEPeYj3Sc1udp/0F04PS8H324AWt4W9Yt6mbHBAAh/bi11v2ICgWI2JbFOJURmN4BVjwILxJEQfmyZdqNvj7KJChxOxpvEsSI19M73CCfWThetQIbvRD/oDg9odS2ogoLbqtqamcY+s3aZnXsLEv4bvLM98li1fOHKpW9Iy7O5vqAbo2doPMmLb9zZNFPEe/awuQ0aWkw+rphX0oT0qVvUxXFPQZ5gKisorg74145wh9W2df7D3V+TYr8yX0LXxDPfp/iejTH8VlDluhuA==
X-YMail-OSG: ZYZXTpQVM1lXQB_NuB6a_DoNcMOgu_cqNuxB2ou0FlNAD9mHmnZcpOejOyyxcAx BFlu16hI8JeeBrEjk.PpCwukmWIItnkd_YUMRG3JfK0jRn22PmRfjLbTV.SeS1PdHjn9Egrq4qbY mWFlhdXq7brTkKNxEiYHRWKqVgKFvZOXXVCEtSGmpFDD6._ykU0OFMHf_oPK9ZgGTF_3TRh3mqO5 zdDhyNBLBhPKrzfDsDgfdX6VNeSN0Wu9weR07IW2DV5aMZTsxnYZYFCfARtTx3gOXTPjBQuWFOw8 Eqv50Z0z2eNReynU39p1_tMj46332fHQRVwT_hfyb3RZJdkb7T2gvT1s1IPP.lg7PI9_16HWe8Pc 5QOhkuORbfAmjVJkfdxAzduc_1Z00gDWtV63MWmPi3aLtTM7BPkJB9R5.oMyh_Md6xAAr0aFnhRT eBQHI3xs4UqGS_HH3Drx1umnucZWlUUADhJII_sM_10cHY3hoLHplHTCrcm_aSgd1UpLKuHAEvaK w50mzVWDXO0RB9dOdam6rXcowg0KE2R99njbySx0jqIDHSdAmdOO5WAE8bBievnETD5rJOBgSwSy Jbn_Xhnep5vbn4mffWxHNLTb.CJkJyy6k2TSq3egLNJBeQe7ed4.Lo7.ak0RNEdiBvyL8VvlS22X huXJLIq9eazwDMumIB67mUzYZEb7SSSGvzXX38AT5EsdTz5lMao7Ji.Sy_F6fV8PNzfE2laireS6 fbZ_pYM3o11BzEBeUTRtLYdhzmNTnT_hulxFaKBxFSscroG5GE06aWdzCRtG9Dti.0gPcYJomdVs zVtxVQGBPD2BFDBl0uVLdoKDxIReSoofVjkiFI6s9kpdvT8YHc9j4M2FOPKo1ALoHloXPodxR5.J __qwfoTPzMaRUTPKzlT2.1f8ekX31wBonEa0zE3tYoYh5aaoaMmxE57Jj4OT9.qhgtUAcHXvGbD3 2XZZ9vw1PF6uJBvWMmo_PfaCFrOrukHuVIEdViF1T5HJoJF8pU0DYUuTez8a3Gzeaac1AsITUt3M yCQSokxjNK7afThUwuB7SZYhbDUAR5yFR2LI3FtX1aNo13PhnzP221SnsG8YceamNNF.nDmKFYI. ogRAhWu0Xu3Z51N3IHHB9frd2WmEfFAmGUNumv0ZUhRMz1sm2txoUMEnfwc9eBXQ.mskyC_9qiXv LPpqB9CTAwsCeNuXATL5xLJIGVAV6pQ63vcdVN2xToBH6F3Qsq1X1WyQA9W9aIaW2BEWaZH5xMd9 qhKKg0X4PRmZH8p_7vPuaKNarweS.GVOBC4MfN_J0y4ASOX4spogPzlNZz8W.41mGlIZJOC6a1BA e4i9ToqP_YW6a5OKWU3WspDJDc64okY.r6QVrDCo2ZBhcWY1K5D7kZ3vieHw_Qnyelj6EikQGCur 0jcVhiqbIzpiZsU3fzBkEfC2QsDf1SatNpfSWzmSbEPkXkd3WcOgJWK_WBAPcoXVwuhQ5Yjw.zhd Z_NnYpZVzvO1FlltmPCuDnphon_FK7A2muNIQTnu7FxLxl_2wihsTymHNJo2criT9G_vjl1dIjOP nip6tYzfvCBGWYF5C6js2KveNWCdF1VZZyu13cXnzT4txLBbNG8d3x89AzE2vte7VUjieBdY0Hbx NOQzWEzspBe4WC5017X9SZyR_muoLywVAqpY783Fd6.0R7EAWJzhGQn1CLE.NqaSTzHFo3WZGqEO cVUj3eQeFEOfl1lpppHqSEziEN_93KBRdH910MUG2rg2n.oOHqjW6z4lCtT53Ol0uhwFHI1XaSZ0 X03sDfDmAuoc4rfwLgR2yt_mo25cRJFBAz5k2rlxWUw7IWdPN8koDbo2i1CS.8wDu1lQKTIk2vuh ZNtnQJHUWD2snNWUenE._BSvBw7Bll5BrnfCjb.3yO.QWzgEha7rMCjwzTiiSt.8NXhTMJVrCfIX YSW_x9ITd8dVOHxi_Y.jyI6Msj1y1G6Hd1kQXWG4Jt882FIP9IJgwmEWS9LDpwXhQBZf3QQSaeUs lSjpH4xylZmHiVBEeiB1nV4RmDUk.g.rzMeNRygwDIGStAtzEuVlvxvhTVj1861oGHcGcX8Xwxwx EBrd1YGq5n0um5uT1IV.s1uyUUZyAAkusl4NYZKF.mKwmz3Z3k0O3qzV3ce9fIYFXVC9DAiQAqFc dOCUz7_3w95M0N7N0Pr1_3KYl6.ifBtL2YYsD3xZh8sjBo7Q19WAvsDwIRqeY5JpidQ3OV9aqFT7 uJZeHbXm4uGspZFE9MxXkuzM2XedbFOL9S_6NZuKQkvVCCo1Z8yzSehF3WfJXSEs0NOfOWcus0LM HWJg8KLuHgPzDxcfXrNtcO.WNLZdAd7yOrv5fzAQoNXDLPpaFjYQFdf0j3PIfku9dzmrjBHXji3e yh502ylXYm8Eg3RdFnEfYg8.K83p8ALPk2.mkY7Sqex9UI9RMQdAyDJ77.lIEU26xlb65xdTj03A OCUdBfCLCloW3bAPrwkc0zvx4tkLKXO6BSwnjcxov0NTjNkT5IyT6xiQe8VhlzAslAVvhLeZijhB P9rymvDydTqnnmxoerbMBKineBmHPYTDd0G.kVNV9WxADTl1wCwDdlJ9z
X-Sonic-MF: <reshad@yahoo.com>
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic312.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 18:20:00 +0000
Received: by kubenode512.mail-prod1.omega.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 728c96ef73b5870830cf77e5394d4e77; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 18:19:59 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.44.20121301
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:19:57 -0400
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-stability-09.txt
From: Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <99B84AE8-6991-44B5-A9DA-E3207066E505@yahoo.com>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-stability-09.txt
References: <161810679639.9580.2229281487865880588@ietfa.amsl.com> <250BFE63-AF4E-4B6F-B881-065377B25134@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <250BFE63-AF4E-4B6F-B881-065377B25134@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="B_3700995599_473256274"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.18121 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/16)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/ttK347xmttSlSLToISEdM5iDzPI>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 18:20:09 -0000

Hi Mahesh,

Thanks for the update, looks good.

Nits:

Section 6.1:
Is lsp really needed in this paragraph? If lsp is kept, please capitalize to LSP (and add a reference).
   This YANG module augments the "ietf-bfd" module to add the loss count
   to the per-session or lsp for BFD packets that are lost.

Section 7.2: s/registers one YANG modules/registers one YANG module/

Also, a couple of minor comments from a previous version haven't been addressed  (see attached).

Regards,
Reshad.


On 2021-04-10, 10:20 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani" <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:

    This version of the draft addresses YANG Doctors comments and also removes the augmentation of TE model, as it has been dropped from the BFD YANG model also.

    Comments are welcome.

    > On Apr 10, 2021, at 7:06 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    > 
    > 
    > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
    > This draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection WG of the IETF.
    > 
    >        Title           : BFD Stability
    >        Authors         : Ashesh Mishra
    >                          Mahesh Jethanandani
    >                          Ankur Saxena
    >                          Santosh Pallagatti
    >                          Mach Chen
    >                          Peng Fan
    > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-bfd-stability-09.txt
    > 	Pages           : 13
    > 	Date            : 2021-04-10
    > 
    > Abstract:
    >   This document describes extensions to the Bidirectional Forwarding
    >   Detection (BFD) protocol to measure BFD stability.  Specifically, it
    >   describes a mechanism for detection of BFD packet loss.
    > 
    > 
    > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-stability/
    > 
    > There are also htmlized versions available at:
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-stability-09
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-stability-09
    > 
    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-stability-09
    > 
    > 
    > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    > 
    > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    > 
    > 

    Mahesh Jethanandani
    mjethanandani@gmail.com




--- Begin Message ---
Hi Santosh,

 

Thanks for making the changes and addressing my comments.

 

Nits:
Null was changed to NULL except in the header of section 4
In section 4, it’d be good to have informative references for CFM and OWAMP.
 

Regards,

Reshad.

 

From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Santosh P K <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 8:35 AM
To: rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-stability-07.txt

 

I have refreshed stability draft. Diff from the previous version is attached. 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:28 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-stability-07.txt
To: Ankur Saxena <ankurpsaxena@gmail.com>om>, Ashesh Mishra <mishra.ashesh@gmail.com>om>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>om>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>om>, Peng Fan <fanp08@gmail.com>om>, Santosh Pallagatti <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>




A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-bfd-stability-07.txt
has been successfully submitted by Santosh Pallagatti and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-bfd-stability
Revision:       07
Title:          BFD Stability
Document date:  2021-01-14
Group:          bfd
Pages:          6
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bfd-stability-07.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-stability/
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-stability
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-stability-07
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-stability-07

Abstract:
   This document describes extensions to the Bidirectional Forwarding
   Detection (BFD) protocol to measure BFD stability.  Specifically, it
   describes a mechanism for detection of BFD packet loss.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


--- Begin Message ---
Sure will do that.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 5:54 AM Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Hi Santosh, authors,
>
>
>
> The comments below are pretty minor. Please address them in next rev and
> we’ll be good to go to next step for this document.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Reshad,
>
>
>
> *From: *Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Reshad Rahman
> (rrahman)" <rrahman=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 23, 2020 at 10:43 PM
> *To: *Santosh P K <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>om>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <
> rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: New Version Notification for
> draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt
>
>
>
> Hi Santosh,
>
>
>
> Thanks for addressing the comments.
>
>
>
> General: NULL authentication TLV is still used, should be replaced with
> NULL authentication type or section as appropriate.
>
> Be consistent for Null v/s NULL (NULL Auth is used in
> bfd-optimizing-authentication)
>
>
>
> Introduction
>
> s/detect lost packet/detect lost packets/
>
>
>
> Section 3 Use Cases:
>
> s/any BFD packet loss if loss/any BFD packet loss if the loss/
>
> s/BFD implementation/BFD implementations/
>
> Where the text says “failure of a link”, might be better to say “failure
> of a datapath”?
>
> Informative references to CFM and TWAMP would be useful
>
>
>
> Section 4
>
> “by appending the Null-Authentication type “. Suggest “by appending an authentication section with the NULL Authentication type “
>
>
>
> Section 5
>
> “BFD uses authentication TLV”, suggest change to “BFD uses an
> authentication section”.
>
>
>
> “BFD packets MUST include NULL-Auth TLV”. Change to “BFD control packets
> MUST include an authentication section with the NULL Authentication type”
>
>
>
> Section 5.1
>
>
>
> “The first BFD NULL-Auth type processed by the receiver…”.  Change to  “The first BFD authentication section with the NULL Authentication type, in a valid BFD control packet, processed by the receiver” .
>
> Also, does it have to be NULL Auth, I believe it can be any auth with sequence number? If that’s the case change to  “The first BFD authentication section with a non-zero sequence number, in a valid BFD control packet, processed by the receiver is used for….”.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Reshad.
>
>
>
> *From: *Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Santosh P K <
> santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, July 19, 2020 at 4:06 PM
> *To: *"rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Fwd: New Version Notification for
> draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>     A new version of draft for BFD-stablity is here for review. Changes
> include addressing shepherd comments as provided here.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-stability/shepherdwriteup/.
> Please also see attached diff.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Santosh P K
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 4:41 PM
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt
> To: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>om>, Ankur Saxena <ankurpsaxena@gmail.com>om>,
> Peng Fan <fanp08@gmail.com>om>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>om>,
> Ashesh Mishra <mishra.ashesh@gmail.com>om>, Santosh Pallagatti <
> santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Santosh Pallagatti and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-ietf-bfd-stability
> Revision:       06
> Title:          BFD Stability
> Document date:  2020-07-13
> Group:          bfd
> Pages:          6
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-stability/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-stability
> Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06
>
> Abstract:
>    This document describes extensions to the Bidirectional Forwarding
>    Detection (BFD) protocol to measure BFD stability.  Specifically, it
>    describes a mechanism for detection of BFD packet loss.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---