Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08.txt
xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Thu, 06 July 2023 02:28 UTC
Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5548C1524AA for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2023 19:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cNBhWnA3Ei45 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2023 19:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 573FBC1522C4 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2023 19:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4QxL6N1tVFz5R9k8 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 10:27:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app04.zte.com.cn ([10.40.12.64]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 3662RTL3041531 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 10:27:29 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 10:27:30 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 10:27:30 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc64a62692ffffffffd3b-84627
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202307061027307005159@zte.com.cn>
References: 168860999862.54118.13323854148316071804@ietfa.amsl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08.txt
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 3662RTL3041531
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 64A626AC.000/4QxL6N1tVFz5R9k8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/vg5V9-T-EqYJQTcUoDDdi4Pd2t8>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 02:28:01 -0000
Dear BFD WG, A new -08 version of Unaffiliated BFD Echo has just been posted. Link and Diff as below. This version is intended to address Greg's comments on -07 version of this draft. Many thanks to Greg for his thorough review and helpful comments. Best Regards, Xiao Min Original From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <i-d-announce@ietf.org>; Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Date: 2023年07月06日 10:20 Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) WG of the IETF. Title : Unaffiliated BFD Echo Authors : Weiqiang Cheng Ruixue Wang Xiao Min Reshad Rahman Raj Chetan Boddireddy Filename : draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2023-07-05 Abstract: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is a fault detection protocol that can quickly determine a communication failure between two forwarding engines. This document proposes a use of the BFD Echo where the local system supports BFD but the neighboring system does not support BFD. BFD Control packet and its processing procedures can be executed over the BFD Echo port where the neighboring system only loops packets back to the local system. This document updates RFC 5880. The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/ There is also an htmlized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08.t… internet-drafts
- Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08 Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… xiao.min2
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… xiao.min2
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… xiao.min2
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… xiao.min2
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… xiao.min2
- Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-… xiao.min2