Re: WG Adoption request for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 11 December 2018 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF67712F18C for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:52:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qmKcVNc0j4sz for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:52:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE0912777C for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:52:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id v1-v6so12256707ljd.0 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:52:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K3cS6pPfWZxJbEfWPE24ZZSGZ0cG6hmebDA8p3XNBHs=; b=Lqc1eBRpWWo3QtYIfA9IflHNiLjjKYRLrWERSrR253CoTjhXGZgPtuaypzessF2UcZ TZLRqbjCKZnp6wLXVkIsCOgHrDTibe4ncobhoN2+VlrOWP292hf+XslxA/EQaTEEYWgS LdmQ3yehnURZaQZCR5qmu3MCDSRiJhmbA4QFyFa5/F9MuoLvNCML/aATxW3+WgZImcK4 +Tvs9kB2gTT9DXbf1udulm4bfOwBDuqMa9nLERhjtuCyVOE+9nU7rU38yX79put1eN4C uvjLYdL1hxW3jXVm++L7BmmJ0YnalqnnBYPcWJKB/ZhWZAXVbGCYU1QymPakg6p49la8 iFfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K3cS6pPfWZxJbEfWPE24ZZSGZ0cG6hmebDA8p3XNBHs=; b=iuz3i04qddDScpTmM+nNT8djVMGYgpv+P8KXi+g8q6i2hVeWCYUmCDx0ZrFmBo5Na0 /V+RdAnS+4dDKaSjNkLAVgsRURD80/X6ORPkU6QbFz94dx80y9NbmooImrbRv8vvyuC/ Es79lEE1kDU58homF+gmUPMY8MfKuWccDL0Eo5zrsedLQjDeKZwXtwkqX3tyNts6NL8r WORMf9hTME9+pLfEKuPDQvWRIb5cCfoXL23trFj0N/uW1BNsGQwQ5dtNnlppgIwzc6CW wV/cjKWjli70DwacwZX+03mH7flmhPgLvJnavojgPgqZY4lsmI2uzBAMhLPofih7xqDn 0Y0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZiurrfQNYutgEOAk7DQQ9aPXGBq6mBQn3MNinafUIWVppMElOw NR2qoEBECknTJIk8nUngENzCswhvtNyNEF/tZY5Z7g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XRwdCYoS5Q7bitqD+fvjgDl9G7FuEk9Ubp6+ETCG1wieydCimnTjfZNOHEox+PwZwY5yL72Dlbqcbv0BB7ZV8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4819:: with SMTP id v25-v6mr10006895lja.2.1544518342919; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:52:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181017222431.GK17157@pfrc.org> <20181121222755.GC23096@pfrc.org> <CA+RyBmWeRoySs4a8he5ZGMz-_FDjzTeHMCd_4WksDSCqB5aEYw@mail.gmail.com> <20181210220953.GA6053@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181210220953.GA6053@pfrc.org>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:52:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWUu3h=giX2mqyZcSVgdts3mgwb4hEbcFBNZTd8CCYc1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG Adoption request for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002dc8fa057cbb33b4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/zOzrTGiwNquUKJ5_879-JojkrAs>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:52:27 -0000

Hi Jeff, et al.,
thank you for the update. I wanted to clarify the second item, the question
related to the IPR Disclosure. The first disclosure used the "covenant not
to assert" language. The second was to only update the filing status, not
the licensing terms. I believe I've clarified that at the time of asking
for WG AP. I was informed that there's the update to IPR Disclosure on this
work submitted that restores the "covenant not to assert" language. I hope
that can be taken into consideration by you and Reshad.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10 PM Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> Greg,
>
> Apologies for the long delay in reply.
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 02:40:50PM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> > I respectfully ask to summarize the comments that were shared with you
> and
> > to publish them to the WG without naming the authors.
>
> Tersely:
> - The document is not addressing fundamental issues.
> - It is encumbered by IPR.
> - Observed list traffic regarding question on the feature was not
>   satisfactorily converging.
>
> > And I have to admit that I don't understand your suggestion to use the
> > Errata. The procedures to apply the Demand mode described in the draft
> are
> > not in contradiction with RFC 5880, so the suggestion to use Errata
> > surprised me.
>
> I will respond on my own analysis in detail hopefully this week.  I am
> awaiting the resolution of a particular bit of correspondence before
> determining the tenor of my response.
>
> -- Jeff
>