Re: IETF 105

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 04 July 2019 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0811201D4 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 02:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gvmgia92Qf_2 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 02:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A671201D3 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 02:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id n9so5085891wmi.0 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 02:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ROeobth5yGXC/IN9Hkm2kM/pOjxH+KFme67PvEivkY0=; b=XwAMFQ0c5VH3RbW2WnNprKMo0CRTKAoOMXrAramXGyiDy67eRhANS0zz9NZfjzo2yU fnt4B0AkFpDUMp9Y9jF4kOKWQwq5tWJlmslOJh0xiuEfd1E3/yfw6cIfbv2dYgM8WgK9 TZkVxQkCVk2nUlsXmdEgxdFhPNom3H8wQ4kV1L0jMgxGiVAFYvRm8ltUCbOZsSh1SMsZ 7KzBdjaFfs0kMNrucuOGQ3aJcz8tUMSnO4SWXRmKItbW9RYod7/jCD4gkk/QmYqlveRX 2vF5r+jWhSgfIWM1ek9UxKAtN2n8pttSaBNhlMYe36Q3SK1L3EfQ10lHx1VTIaDZ/2dE okIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ROeobth5yGXC/IN9Hkm2kM/pOjxH+KFme67PvEivkY0=; b=ch0iB+jsQMwk5nrDc8akyIUvxjaPBxODIGznau9XZvwaViGalwT7jisQ2ESbcXR11j KUMGVpLp1HyAUcukQ07V20a9WBBfJbAl42sV0+UrcoYb17C4xIzQDQh057j8EsTLOnjZ OAtfUiTe50vZqbxpHfUmVGmBHyui9pl+h40NwsLQR8kSqs79KNEiLJYjgH3ejoNIXaEW PJXH9chnx0T3AmJTa3If1Zmle1F6rcDEHEtL7KZjeiAeeqwEDHuiMZgomGmNMSSFvcjJ ghIuZTIkTxH1qHMj1FeyGyhP4gZpIepmJHwfxwqs/QtQFJTKBDZ/j9EsseERMnYCtGQ1 NafA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpQch5YS723MTiSnkknczfGqF8EWMQTYcGGYDnBi98qc9m/732 rj3uf6MimboAakw9Bxpmgi2CVGH1zXE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwl8KVz5g5gkI9nYwrL3Pp/Ny6ftHANZslcynZIfYlcXo5ScIydXpJLRmIQ7iZ31rbJyHQSzQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6a17:: with SMTP id f23mr11591518wmc.91.1562233493769; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 02:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (79-75-43-71.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [79.75.43.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm4744494wmi.22.2019.07.04.02.44.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jul 2019 02:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: IETF 105
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190702190422.GC3974@pfrc.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:44:51 +0100
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0C53B492-FA2A-477A-860A-C784DFD40BF6@gmail.com>
References: <20190702190422.GC3974@pfrc.org>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/zccM0ujUMr-IyXNLSyizcdcQmuQ>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 09:44:58 -0000

Hi Jeff,

> On Jul 2, 2019, at 8:04 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>; wrote:
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> Reshad had put out a call for presentations for IETF 105 in mid-June.  As of
> this time, we don't currently have any agenda requests.
> 
> A quick status of current work:
> - BFD for vxlan is undergoing post WGLC expert review at the request of our
>  Area Director.
> - BFD Authentication drafts need discussion in the working group on how to
>  progress or not.
> - Unsolicited BFD is stable, and a trivial draft.  We've received a prod
>  from the authors asking if the next step is WGLC.
> - BFD for Large Packets is stable, and waiting on implementations.
> - BFD in Demand Mode has discussion pending with author and Area Director.
> 
> Potential future work:
> - RFC 5884 bis.  (RFC 5884 authors willing to contribute.)
> - BFD v2 or not.  Greg seeded the discussion at IETF 104.
> 
> BFD as a working group needs to meet only if it advances discussion on our
> work.  If we don't have anything requiring group discussion outside of
> mailing list, we may consider canceling our timeslot.

I do see that we need discussion around the authentication draft …

> 
> -- Jeff
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com