Re: IETF 105

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 04 July 2019 09:44 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: IETF 105
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190702190422.GC3974@pfrc.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 10:44:51 +0100
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0C53B492-FA2A-477A-860A-C784DFD40BF6@gmail.com>
References: <20190702190422.GC3974@pfrc.org>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/zccM0ujUMr-IyXNLSyizcdcQmuQ>
Precedence: list

Hi Jeff,

> On Jul 2, 2019, at 8:04 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> Reshad had put out a call for presentations for IETF 105 in mid-June.  As of
> this time, we don't currently have any agenda requests.
> 
> A quick status of current work:
> - BFD for vxlan is undergoing post WGLC expert review at the request of our
>  Area Director.
> - BFD Authentication drafts need discussion in the working group on how to
>  progress or not.
> - Unsolicited BFD is stable, and a trivial draft.  We've received a prod
>  from the authors asking if the next step is WGLC.
> - BFD for Large Packets is stable, and waiting on implementations.
> - BFD in Demand Mode has discussion pending with author and Area Director.
> 
> Potential future work:
> - RFC 5884 bis.  (RFC 5884 authors willing to contribute.)
> - BFD v2 or not.  Greg seeded the discussion at IETF 104.
> 
> BFD as a working group needs to meet only if it advances discussion on our
> work.  If we don't have anything requiring group discussion outside of
> mailing list, we may consider canceling our timeslot.

I do see that we need discussion around the authentication draft …

> 
> -- Jeff
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

IETF 105 Jeffrey Haas
Re: IETF 105 Mahesh Jethanandani