Re: [RTG-DIR] [Lsr] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-17.txt

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Hi Erik,

On 14/11/18 14:24 , Erik Auerswald wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> please see inline (I have kept just the relevant part):
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:13:37PM +0100, Peter Psenak wrote:
>> On 14/11/18 12:49 , Tomonori Takeda wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> 1) Flooding Scope of SR-Algorithm TLV
>>> In Section 4.1, it says:
>>>
>>>     "If the SR-Algorithm TLV appears in
>>>      multiple OSPFv3 Router Information Opaque LSAs that have different
>>>      flooding scopes, the SR-Algorithm TLV in the OSPFv3 Router
>>>      Information Opaque LSA with the area-scoped flooding scope MUST be
>>>      used."
>>>
>>> At the same time, it say:
>>>
>>>     "For the purpose of SR-Algorithm TLV advertisement, area-
>>>      scoped flooding is REQUIRED."
>>>
>>> So, does it mean a) a router MUST use area-scoped flooding for sending,
>>> and
>>
>> no. It says that that for the purpose of the SR-Algorithm TLV area scope is
>> required. That means it cannot be link-scope, but it can be
>> autonomous-system scope, because that is also covering the area-scope.
>
> May I suggest to add the words "at least" to make the wording more
> explicit?
>
>      "For the purpose of SR-Algorithm TLV advertisement, at least
>       area-scoped flooding is REQUIRED."

sure, will do that.

thanks,
Peter

>
> Thanks,
> Erik
> .
>