Re: [RTG-DIR] RTG-DIR QA review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-03.txt

Tomonori Takeda <tomonori.takeda@ntt.com> Sun, 30 April 2017 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tomonori.takeda@ntt.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA48312954C; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2O2pOEl2fkE0; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 05:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw030.noc.ntt.com (mgw030.noc.ntt.com [210.160.55.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A442129454; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 05:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c0044i0.coe.ntt.com (c0044i0.nc.agilit-hosting.com [10.18.161.13]) by mgw030.noc.ntt.com (NTT Com MailSV) with ESMTP id 296831C581DD; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 21:18:22 +0900 (JST)
Received: from C0039I0.coe.ntt.com (10.18.160.43) by c0044i0.coe.ntt.com (10.18.161.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.339.0; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 21:18:21 +0900
Received: from C0561I0.coe.ntt.com ([169.254.1.133]) by C0039I0.coe.ntt.com ([10.18.160.43]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 21:18:21 +0900
From: Tomonori Takeda <tomonori.takeda@ntt.com>
To: "'rtg-ads@ietf.org'" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
CC: "'rtg-dir@ietf.org'" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "'draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org'" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org>, "'rtgwg@ietf.org'" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RTG-DIR QA review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-03.txt
Thread-Index: AdLA7qLGXj0F8yDgRaK42VOyHjaunAAvOLJg
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:18:20 +0000
Message-ID: <EB0F2EAC05E9C64D80571F2042700A2A8673D88A@C0561I0.coe.ntt.com>
References: <EB0F2EAC05E9C64D80571F2042700A2A8673D7D9@C0561I0.coe.ntt.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB0F2EAC05E9C64D80571F2042700A2A8673D7D9@C0561I0.coe.ntt.com>
Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US
Content-Language: ja-JP
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ccmail-original-to: rtg-ads@ietf.org
x-ccmail-original-cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
x-originating-ip: [10.25.153.185]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/26KNN1Ds2DPG3ooSsCD7xpfPTlw>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RTG-DIR QA review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-03.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:19:57 -0000

# Resend since it seems my previous email was not delivered correctly...

Hi,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate QA reviewer for this draft.

Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-03.txt
Reviewer: Tomonori Takeda
Review Date: April 29, 2017
Intended Status: Standards Track

Here are my comments.

Overall, the document is well organized and clear about problem statement and analysis of SPF triggers and SPF delays impact on micro-loops.

Some specific comments.

1) The document is intended to be Standards Track. I do not think it is common for such analysis document to be Standards Track.

2) Just a nits, but in page 12, it says "In the figure 5", but it seems figures are not numbered.

3) In Section 4.2. Exponential backoff, it is not clear what is a condition (or conditions) to move from FM to BM.

Thanks,
Tomonori Takeda