IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 19 July 2017 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2A8131B16; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1JqELTueongP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D00131CD8; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:a11:96ff:fe01:81e0]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6351F8F6; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:12:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 6FA8A1CCB; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:12:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
cc: l2rs-wg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org, rtg-dir@ietf.org, l2rs@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <010601d3006c$1b142790$513c76b0$@ndzh.com>
References: <10278.1500453903@dooku.sandelman.ca> <010601d3006c$1b142790$513c76b0$@ndzh.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> message dated "Wed, 19 Jul 2017 04:50:41 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:12:37 +0200
Message-ID: <17911.1500466357@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/2mF797yYV2her9_CE5bOe01jWT4>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:12:50 -0000

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
    > One challenge is that your point of view on IS-IS and OSPF models was
    > countered by the Yang doctor's review.  The YANG Doctor's early review
    > removed the CODE-BEGINS/CODE-ENDS.  However, you and the YANG Doctors
    > both have good points.  As chair, I'm going to have to the I2RS AD and
    > the OPS Advice on what to do.

Perhaps EXAMPLE-CODE-BEGINS.  That way it can still be extracted from the xml
via script, but the automatic draft yang validator won't see it.



-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email