Re: [RTG-DIR] [babel] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-01

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Thu, 09 November 2017 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B956B129421; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:19:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1eNTIK_UvKjz; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:19:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5686012778E; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:19:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1510186752; bh=y0xkGrNDrHtWAGuQnmpUWCWdoRm+uU24ZTLx12Gy1oI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=MPAcVpVw45qf2BYcXx6LyBLQvbM7YguXAeZf9dYoxgL7ejk2Qiu5pii8fD0ahefZo Syzw4HcFZGmOVbLVIRTdaWoClnBvF07PHkhTOna9045yGOAKxXeDM+syKOeJA519ww wMYwpjMBYJSM+YCV4xb6GwegVPjlwnqOQwZWfZCcGrUwO7WVhmESeyPXYliA8DUYnH gAtwOShJiRxVE7fuJv88KNL4nHJmvO611AgDFfGY+7SojPU2UctG8eCNE3Kdc5ZDCB 5aLOO//5Ld+4+FRlgK3ceh1tpyDXVQNfdeFympgRZ3NIfy6IdeNkiwyT+wNN7buv7x b0myW+xkRekww==
To: Matthieu Boutier <boutier@irif.fr>, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-source-specific.all@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5FA8E8AC-6BBB-45D0-BDF6-2241179A5477@irif.fr>
References: <150983039829.26601.3109842491855567125@ietfa.amsl.com> <5FA8E8AC-6BBB-45D0-BDF6-2241179A5477@irif.fr>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:18:55 +0900
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87po8sqp74.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/53dABhnzEv08F-Ah0DfMgneU1OI>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] [babel] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-01
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:19:22 -0000

Matthieu Boutier <boutier@irif.fr> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Thank's a lot for this early review.
>
>> Please address the issues reported by id-nits.
>
> Please accept my apologizes about these nits.
>
>> The base Babel (bis) specification does not talk about the handling of
>> duplicate sub-TLVs.  Are multiple source-specific sub-TLVs allowed on a given
>> destination prefix advertisement?
>
> I believe it is clear that a Babel node MUST NOT send two Source Prefix sub-TLVs
> in one TLV.  But If a received TLV has two Source Prefix sub-TLVs, I hesitate:
> does a node SHOULD or MUST ignore the whole TLV?
>
> Does the list have an opinion?

Off the top of my head: Ignore the whole thing; better to fail
(preferably loudly) than carry on with ambiguous semantics.

-Toke