IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10

Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 30 January 2023 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C60C17CE8F; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:10:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5HpPFiML6lP; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:10:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb29.google.com (mail-yb1-xb29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBB7C17CE88; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:10:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb29.google.com with SMTP id 129so14683637ybb.0; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:10:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pHyA4JtblQQoV6P6pvd3o2y3NffCrHYaGTOpAA6vDJk=; b=Wh9LBzUHi9Y2h6rlniTFftqVpw6e+baVGdwEjsBFo7g1GqfxdU7dlVmQUTZH73SatB HtXqqzBMqM5tWkBs1ey6lnluT7mbwAgLGUxaPQwebLD1DpDHHiVTZ/L2ZFcYwxCELzHi sKhAVwJ5uIA5pmGiWwpPnsDG7SIUucd0+t7kic91jG1SQYMDqJcQAOQNdVp4Fbz5YfMX pD8MeeDo3rVmiCI9B0RwBWqlOTsQkpdvrxLUBIswuGt6O5VutiCxWWmpIz/k246+YCSW KzYVfzGj7CSpFYY7p0myf1CNTHtZyB4MYQVYpbRVNVjQ6DmIzE2czdmGKP0dIN4vHBVN 9Y7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pHyA4JtblQQoV6P6pvd3o2y3NffCrHYaGTOpAA6vDJk=; b=tTWSwNxx9XpGvH9bPRZGJnNNFEzXKm2IoEkw7bGUEuTEL6mD7shToFzjBR5s/c7Lm9 kGqOi2IAQ3yUwwOc6++aWHdUtxDT+SAxNAK2hfxO5un2r0dAVOAlBwCDqDUoY+xalY2/ vhO8ma/840nUiTAEY3OYhIHmTGPEckmU9Mt5a5crnwNzmhxutQNK8LplMh8BrJ/+avfy KqiVDs+O9hH0KCb9Wxm776fZBdv9p/lk6ybWCMX6gShUqaj2aSD9/R55VNBXd0PEqG82 cVQnfxytbd/VSNISA7zV1ST+wnTSysqLGwPRaSz5Vik/+5igt75PFKu5RAB+ayDITihD XZmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqlcKPekEO2fD/u7zseI9K1p0Rz5h3H2v4iAnL/upWcSCqY6bM5 LVYlb9HrhCnSvYJFIesLJBU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXv9vPf1XZKhABo9Q4vdFY3mVJ39nRoauwfZKoDnWqJW3oxkrFqFjvqUGxWxM4MSnecaaRgGjg==
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6f55:0:b0:759:a8d8:8bd6 with SMTP id k82-20020a256f55000000b00759a8d88bd6mr37983498ybc.2.1675095045582; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([136.56.133.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dz21-20020a05620a2b9500b00720ae160601sm1420248qkb.22.2023.01.30.08.10.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
From: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB3591537C9435F6035E6703A1B6D29@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:10:34 -0500
Cc: Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8014FCB0-D84C-4020-A017-BB1A0D0DC7F3@gmail.com>
References: <167453622962.572.17548527673007108094@ietfa.amsl.com> <BYAPR11MB3591537C9435F6035E6703A1B6D29@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)" <natal=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/6FtSHDQm7oIx3kE2evH89NQLXW8>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:10:51 -0000


> On Jan 29, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <natal=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mike,
>  Thanks again for your review! We’re applying your suggestions, but we have one quick question regarding one of them, please see below.
>  Thanks,
> Alberto
>  From: Mike McBride via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:57 AM
> To: rtg-dir@ietf.org <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub.all@ietf.org <draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub.all@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org <last-call@ietf.org>, lisp@ietf.org <lisp@ietf.org>
> Subject: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
> 
> Section 7.1:
> 
> Change this:
>    Since Map-Notifies from the Map-Server to the ITR need to be...
> To this:
>    Since Map-Notifies from the Map-Server to the ITR needs to be...
> [AR] The former seems correct to me, would it be ok to leave it as is?

I agree with Alberto. If you remove the two prepositional phrases, the subject is clearly plural and requires a plural verb. 

https://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/subjectVerbAgree.asp

Thanks,
Acee

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status