Re: [RTG-DIR] [Mtgvenue] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-12

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 06 February 2018 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A15126CE8; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 02:01:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SaUmXMJhveAI; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 02:01:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1B81241F5; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 02:01:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2626; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517911304; x=1519120904; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=E7rOvYY6T7gw6PKGAv4dK+ALex1wog2wfYW8cOzuUY0=; b=GzaDyfo62xj9PtHv3q+6j2k+oHst2FqlwwBIhv5epwRFVWYVN1VP/mJg EoIQxODQhnJ7/2D6yjcGSxvOlAo7J9OA3JfzEzbzI7501Vhnm+psrPfMc 6eoomlNepJ/CI44QMsPjVNpzASLQC8e8xc3VK+QW2v2rAh9uwaPSlXtc+ U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BxAQC+fHla/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUnhA2LGI8/mWAHA4U7AoMtFQEBAQEBAQEBAmsohSQBBSNWEAsOCiMHAgJXBgEMCAEBijG4UoInhQCDfoF4AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQ+EaoVUKYMFiDmCZQWkLYRjgjKOX4w3iASXfoE8NSMlgSszGggbFYMEglMdGYFtQY9dAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.46,468,1511827200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="1843086"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Feb 2018 10:01:26 +0000
Received: from [10.61.160.141] ([10.61.160.141]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w16A1PZK029044; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:01:25 GMT
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>, mtgvenue@ietf.org, rtg-dir@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@ietf.org
References: <151782868264.5731.15496399706573021777@ietfa.amsl.com> <15F0E669-0195-4315-AAA5-AED71CD6C5B3@qti.qualcomm.com> <ce5c3e3b-fb8a-0a29-3569-ab61f5de7da0@gmail.com> <D5C2EE24-4A68-40B7-A2A9-9DC0BE88535C@qti.qualcomm.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ed4fd395-7d22-8e46-e6f9-cca359a7b782@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:01:24 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D5C2EE24-4A68-40B7-A2A9-9DC0BE88535C@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LKfn2cD95fs9ugrxgi2cVmEXG4aSQ38Gm"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/6ZIN55SpUBjR8BXLc5JECTVgTBg>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] [Mtgvenue] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-12
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:01:46 -0000

Hi,


On 06.02.18 03:28, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> That a pretty substantial change to a piece of text that took a great
> deal of back and forth on which to come to rough consensus. Perhaps
> Eliot could suggest some text to satisfy your concern that the
> requirement is for more than just the facility, without having to
> re-hash the whole issue.

Unfortunately I do not.  I think the intent here is cover the bear
minimum requirements we need, and otherwise continue  to trust in the
IASA that they really are going to take good care of our participants. 
In short, my suggestion is to run with the current text, and if we have
a problem later, make a chcange

Eliot