Re: [RTG-DIR] [Idr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-21

"Susan Hares" <> Fri, 15 June 2018 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9033130E61; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2VHKgEm-_owr; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A3012D949; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <>, 'Alvaro Retana' <>, 'Bruno Decraene' <>, 'Donald Eastlake' <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 19:19:02 -0400
Message-ID: <01ae01d404ff$3f926f80$beb74e80$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01AF_01D404DD.B882A440"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQEmwtOOcakeukpDNRJP9m9GQnSXOQJIvi+wAWbUZdoCA6cUAgMn1x1DAtMbdq0BGct73aVWOLpQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 180615-4, 06/15/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] [Idr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-21
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 23:19:07 -0000



I think you underestimate your good sense.  Why don’t you respond to this email with text you’ll put in for expert guidance?  I’m sure you’ll get some comments on it.  




From: rtg-dir [] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 3:18 PM
To: Alvaro Retana; Bruno Decraene; Acee Lindem (acee); Donald Eastlake
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] [Idr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-21


Hi Alvaro, 


From: Alvaro Retana <>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2018 at 3:09 PM
To: Acee Lindem <>, Bruno Decraene <>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <>, Donald Eastlake <>
Cc: "" <>, IDR List <>, Routing Directorate <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-21




Never mind about the update, I see you already sent it in!  Thanks!!  :-)


Yes – spent a lot of time on this yesterday on document the second time around. 


…but we do still need guidance for the Designated Experts.


If these appointees are, in fact, experts then why do they require guidance??? I can surely provide some but I think this is just perfunctory bull. Note that there is no “guidance” in  <>









On June 15, 2018 at 3:04:20 PM, Alvaro Retana ( wrote:

I’m ok with this change.  Please remember to put in guidelines for the experts to consider.


Also, this document is scheduled on next week’s IESG Telechat.  Because some ADs start their reviews over the weekend, do you think you can have an update ready  <http://airmail.calendar/2018-06-15%2012:00:00%20EDT> today/tomorrow?