IETF Logo Mail Archive

[RTG-DIR]回复: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com> Wed, 11 September 2024 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F8AC1CAF48; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CgF8CaauaS-P; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2897C1654F2; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4X3bVC2JYqz6K6DS; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:53:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.210]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59D53140B38; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:57:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemd200021.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.2) by lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:57:53 +0100
Received: from kwepemd500019.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.86) by kwepemd200021.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:57:51 +0800
Received: from kwepemd500019.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.86]) by kwepemd500019.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.86]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:57:51 +0800
From: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
To: "Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare)" <dceccare@cisco.com>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11
Thread-Index: AQHa/PSILya3hakXo0S1SSkEKazptrJFXp2AgA0JK4A=
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:57:51 +0000
Message-ID: <61a525668cce4fd9809e44547b8f694e@huawei.com>
References: <172525300265.981632.9152324606577036628@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp> <CY8PR11MB73403E75449299396BB98311D4932@CY8PR11MB7340.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR11MB73403E75449299396BB98311D4932@CY8PR11MB7340.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.181.186]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: 5UGNMECXPOUYUCICCW656RT5SSZ43FRN
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5UGNMECXPOUYUCICCW656RT5SSZ43FRN
X-MailFrom: zhenghaomian@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtg-dir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [RTG-DIR]回复: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/8l79BiqEtK5LWFyAHElx-8m_W2I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtg-dir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtg-dir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtg-dir-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Gyan, 

This is a friendly reminder for the rtgdir review on draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-16, could you help on it? Thanks. 

Best wishes,
Haomian & Daniam

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) <dceccare@cisco.com> 
发送时间: 2024年9月3日 18:52
收件人: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>; rtg-dir@ietf.org
抄送: ccamp@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org
主题: RE: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

Hi Gyan,

Thanks a lot for your review.

We asked for the joint review of two drafts:

- draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11
- draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-16

Would it be possible for you to complete also the review of the second one or do you prefer us to ask Daniam and Haomian to allocate a new reviewer?

Thanks a lot for your help so far.
Daniele  

-----Original Message-----
From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 6:57 AM
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org
Subject: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed the latest version 11 of the draft.  Many thanks to the authors in updating RFC 9193.

AFAIK I believe in this case a BIS to RFC 9193 was the correct path taken to fix all the Layer 0 data types that were missing in RFC 9193. Nicely done and very thorough work done by the authors and all contributors.

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
None

Nits:
None

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status