IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] [babel] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-01

Matthieu Boutier <boutier@irif.fr> Thu, 09 November 2017 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <boutier@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDC51200F1; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 05:48:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YwyRYDTaArvB; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 05:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF963120046; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 05:48:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:1]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/75695) with ESMTP id vA9DmLvU020057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:48:23 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay2/75695) with ESMTP id vA9DmKiF008352; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:48:20 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56C3EB21F; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:48:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 9EcWhBS8LX1H; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:48:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from host-37-32.sg.lan (unknown [172.23.37.32]) (Authenticated sender: boutier) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DDA6EB364; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:48:18 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
From: Matthieu Boutier <boutier@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <804D8548-4A08-4A6E-84B8-6512DF29D402@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 14:48:18 +0100
Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-source-specific.all@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <59C08DBA-7C1E-4325-A0CC-82D7C89B28BC@irif.fr>
References: <150983039829.26601.3109842491855567125@ietfa.amsl.com> <5FA8E8AC-6BBB-45D0-BDF6-2241179A5477@irif.fr> <87po8sqp74.fsf@toke.dk> <804D8548-4A08-4A6E-84B8-6512DF29D402@apple.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]); Thu, 09 Nov 2017 14:48:23 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.141]); Thu, 09 Nov 2017 14:48:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5A045CA5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-Miltered: at potemkin with ID 5A045CA4.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5A045CA5.000 from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/null/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/<boutier@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5A045CA4.003 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<boutier@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5A045CA5.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5A045CA4.003 on potemkin.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/9MOxFd-ZVtB6zu0RwGA7wuNfozk>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] [babel] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-01
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:48:31 -0000

> maybe I summon the wrath of the Gods of the Internet.

Hey! What's the protocol for that? :p

> If you don't expect this to ever be useful, no need to specify it.

Looks good for me, does something like the following make sense?  Should we
recommend something?

    A node does not expect to receive any TLV with two Source Prefix sub-TLVs or
    more.  Whenever that occurs, the behaviour is undefined: an implementation
    may drop the whole packet, the whole TLV or consider only just one of the
    sub-TLVs (this can be the case if the implementation does not check if
    multiple sub-TLVs are sent).

Toke, would you like to see: "It is recommended to ignore the whole packet".
(lower case "recommended")

Matthieu

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status