Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-09.txt

Jake Holland <jakeholland.net@gmail.com> Sun, 15 December 2019 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jakeholland.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A02B1200B1; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:26:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXxlFCdxcpYh; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x541.google.com (mail-ed1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::541]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969E212004C; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x541.google.com with SMTP id m8so2161042edi.13; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:26:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NtyDPeenu83UwQ1Cxoaybd8gx37Qpv3mz3wW1BFR0bo=; b=YiUhONQV3J3ZJL5S8nKnHG3z8zRfwH0/SfYYDg3Z1vvPM8XdD8ieais1dAQnv2e0dm AOmYLCh+DpiX+2s+q174nHTDvcW3hJYsXBPJ1MS2L5ESG/CItSt2Eu411wiY8vsr5QUf m7Esj/uyfaxezniPi2JlTqumkkxkS48KXPR2Uy/esyUJII7P7CTf267jR+HHo7sh7Fvy x7IFW4k4pEuisuu3cM1FnjnNZaUBpHLzYyaxcrmcm7q1H690SOYwAIC7aR5MbDDi4/jF uqpvJ1KSeRbRyJtuQuiRQ8PwD5NXV9ASbzfdTKfxTw3oHGMT8uv4Nqk64b9yeYI6G6vP /AJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NtyDPeenu83UwQ1Cxoaybd8gx37Qpv3mz3wW1BFR0bo=; b=HHYz17j0ldY8GXLJ+z4Utn24PKsVvnV0TTDieOKMkKsNmJo9mJBG5RRI/pi5Uegk7e BscZKfOH5nna+G20OqiFRZdD0VwLsN2UvAx4CmUoPKhzxHYCESbHdmY+oEQZ4xHRvoAT uTFndycDE1BLHmOyfFrHJpewOeTXTipNy1l6QtiGidhCr2Do+Utd7vYoSWuiFS8ES+f4 muYoZui3FwvSrmfFsntUvimzRMEDQsB1jF6lXNZTUknYLNS7vuQIf4WdZqRuxVrFxMM0 WY4fGHwyjagVoVe8wv8y0JCGZAhRxxT/ROqaTunoBsPkQJhLqA/Os1RYXNd5LSQ0wXf+ RmvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU7vtUmeX1iLRp0gyGARl/aKjxb6/sQHUUibQboJFMFj+5KIjao JrHB4PPE+x03WrFr+SYynQxxBpz/2lKrGu3TUlo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz191uR+s6wgp89UcM8lhaGBz6uOiexshRW2VmEaiqWkKUgy91bD+34EuiPWFzlqw882LRPVY5OoXstu/5Qzbw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:20c5:: with SMTP id c5mr4228137ejc.330.1576373202077; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:26:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGnRvuqS1eS70RwK9R_U4vGOmZWXyn5TNtScbxtXBCDdYzUSVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvuqS1eS70RwK9R_U4vGOmZWXyn5TNtScbxtXBCDdYzUSVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jake Holland <jakeholland.net@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:26:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGac5AhauiuhWJgufJEVNnYMOj1xWx+SdX--ehiD2QiFbHKC-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Cc: "<rtg-ads@ietf.org>" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery.all@ietf.org, mboned@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be4d9c0599b3fc12"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/Ce4KuirZDSbneoBaFZdcUFta9mg>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-09.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 01:26:45 -0000

Hi Henning,

Thanks for the review.  Answers to your questions below:

On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:34 AM Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nits:
> * If an application with integrated AMT gateway does know the domain
> of the multicast sender, does it make sense to do a DNS-SD query to
> the sender?
>

Did you have a reason in mind for why this would be helpful?

I think nothing in this spec prevents the use of an alternative discovery
mechanism, but nothing occurs to me for what situation would make
this helpful or necessary.


> * In section 4.2.1 (RData Format - Precedence) you discuss that the
> Precedence field is used in the same way as the PREFERENCE field in MX
> RData. In a SRV record the field Priority has the same semantics. Is
> there a reason why you choose not to reuse one of the other names?


I modeled the design on the IPSECKEY RR, because it's a somewhat
similar discovery usage, and I think I just used the same thing they did.
I didn't go through a very extensive search for the best name.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4025#section-3

Thanks and regards,
Jake