[RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate Early Review for "MPLS Network Action (MNA) Sub-Stack Solution" - draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr-04
Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 April 2024 14:37 UTC
Return-Path: <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03869C169407; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwHIlcb_Tioj; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE809C157938; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-78f02c96c52so140423085a.1; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714142225; x=1714747025; darn=ietf.org; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=l4KY0G8e4gOtbVzNjv5tdwFrPpydKK8/0i2TWc8o6Fg=; b=GPeKsFZUNhAgzZXFqgLuEFhdhw5Wvrc1XGT1dYesxqeE2Y1GVkhgXvl8/zm+VnFQsF 2XJcYhy4IBOuQAzfXyOaUgAjaQNO/fCroM1J2KgBTkfj5A83cSVFaTh5N/t30NAtoM5o hYgjKVgcIEjqT8h9GS3u7aM1E8v4AaF/de990K737aWfR8/PuEfE3cSCJA/ON23i/oyD 0oktAPyVO5jUgSE2jvWSEib114U9OednzAA3KjHvTPKVyLihHwRVFCTjbui6ymTIw1vX 48uJC1kw6DO5oC92+UYtIX7P2USJKCiOvhYwqGphYDDooJK0twos8bPZA+ypJ5gYgZ8L yhQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714142225; x=1714747025; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=l4KY0G8e4gOtbVzNjv5tdwFrPpydKK8/0i2TWc8o6Fg=; b=SJGRMirUymX5h48k3fuGZy1LpUzFRlzTe9TKAktkBTzbtu0PuTOpuaqaBzB5EwDBRD VYiYPJ3OPIMzPJnMJO471pfFJvbFi/CsmTavEsdnY9B+kt+ns2seHur7GnQEygh94lC8 EsTw2TNBQVtSWQIkUKsBTxySGeJ/AHhZXW/zggvSG3AM1PLY1JtxvpkAbDvLSrK8yBJj 8+G/PkUGHY1tIM08i0UIL3Abg50oddnZykj73GlPPkeCodZFQX8MD+OQE53QwG7lA9hO qPIio9i6StLoo33AURzOO+xz8iLxLz5fNOkaGFTuSsGIU8GrHW6fujrvt75gm+Gu/liR Z/Vg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWrA/1cmD2D0u7nQwDEjYuNQEjUqtckxSFPtvPQVDmz2Bbj0nkdSNcR12n37GnEMVBdCAoUlquHGHpC9mrdRvYSAy4JSyPR/2OW2nSt17OLM17Rqiz2wD1+TiUTEaxrQR0dcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz6nJCtJna+x/xyBmunZGpegxUH6mkEKC3QkPVSo11ldbwcyPSW 40Ug51j2IYjyY6QGaR/ff+IngNB8OH5ADNpwKa74DLjnQjT1FIwdGwbx0Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGTI+yym1TV2FO2TZVY9xXeVldNIZh76OfScT/6xBxDW6Z0O9D9KHTtQCwH5n+nyctlZVOOFw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:5717:b0:78f:ec9:387f with SMTP id wi23-20020a05620a571700b0078f0ec9387fmr2707375qkn.56.1714142225081; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2605:a601:918a:7600:6174:989e:170f:f879]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p2-20020ae9f302000000b0079088fca179sm2839960qkg.76.2024.04.26.07.37.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6EFC2247-F3CB-4F0A-A804-809BC8A449CB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Message-Id: <8956C0EB-CED6-4F2C-97BF-237708DFE514@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:36:53 -0400
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
To: Routing ADs <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/D4huRrk_nuP_eFcAeW0JD7VQF8I>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate Early Review for "MPLS Network Action (MNA) Sub-Stack Solution" - draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr-04
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:37:11 -0000
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Early Review/Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr-04.txt Reviewer: Acee Lindem Review Date: 04/26/2024 IETF LC End Date: N/A - Early Review Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: This abstract very succinctly summarises the draft as defining the the MPLS Network Action (MNA) sub-stack solution for carrying Network Actions and Ancillary Data in the label stack. The document is well-written but one really needs to have read draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk and it is also benefiical to have read draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements. My review didn't uncover any defects in the encodings and backward compatibility. However, while I follow the MPLS WG, I didn't have the time bandwidth to participate in the design team. Nevertheless, I feel this is important work and support its advancement. Given the multiple levels methods of encoding, the implications, and backward compatibility considerations, I feel that implementations should be required prior to publication. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: Possibly consider removing the examples in section 5.6 and referring to the more detailed examples in section 14. Nits: I've attached some editorial suggestions including the hyphenation of multi-word adjectives to improve readability. Thanks, Acee