IETF Logo Mail Archive

[RTG-DIR] REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection

Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com> Fri, 28 August 2015 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72DC1AD373 for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nl7gbZePsZS4 for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ENFICSETS1.metaswitch.com (enficsets1.metaswitch.com [192.91.191.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D4A71A8EA9 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ENFICSCAS1.datcon.co.uk (172.18.10.61) by ENFICSETS1.metaswitch.com (172.18.4.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:48:20 +0100
Received: from ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::d5d5:c683:a3be:3a19]) by ENFICSCAS1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::3d12:12a9:26af:c7%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:48:20 +0100
From: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
To: "'rtg-dir@ietf.org'" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection
Thread-Index: AdDhsCSRlQrRGwKrQtSA5Vv5rjov3w==
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:48:20 +0000
Message-ID: <09CE6C3BE5E1EA40B987BF5F25D8DDBA0139CBACBB@ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:0:c05b:bffa:3853:1939:a95a:29a9]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_09CE6C3BE5E1EA40B987BF5F25D8DDBA0139CBACBBENFICSMBX1dat_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/JKlo-tZXGpbVPniwosEpscaZYl8>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:48:29 -0000

Dear routing directorate

I'm trying to find a reviewer for this draft.
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection-05.txt

The draft is in IETF last call, which ends on September 8, so we need to get a review pronto.

Is there a hero(ine) out there (excluding authors and MPLS chairs!) who can step up and provide a review?  We are not looking for deep expertise in mLDP - the review is from the point of view of technical readability and ease of understanding, so any of you should be able to do it.

Many thanks!
Jon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email