Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd

[Tal Mizrahi <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for the prompt response and update.

The current draft addresses all the issues I raised.

Cheers,
Tal.

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:42 PM Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Tal,
>
>
>
> Many thanks for your comments.
>
> Updated draft has been published for your review.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> *From: *Tal Mizrahi <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Monday, August 20, 2018 at 23:45
> *To: *<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>,
> <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *<[e-mail]>, "Yemin (Amy)" <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd
> *Resent-From: *<[e-mail]>
> *Resent-To: *Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>, <
> [e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
> *Resent-Date: *Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes
> on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to
> the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please
> see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
>
> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
> would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last
> Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
> discussion or by updating the draft.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd
> Reviewer: Tal Mizrahi
> Review Date: 21-Aug-2018
> Intended Status: Standards Track
>
> *Summary:*
>
> This document is basically ready for publication, but has a couple of
> minor issues and nits that should be resolved prior to publication.
>
> *Minor Issues:*
>
>    - Figure 1 seems to indicate that the MSD-Type and the MSD-Value are 2
>    octets long each, whereas according to the text afterwards each of the two
>    fields is 1 octet long.
>    - Figure 2 – same comment.
>
> *Nits:*
>
>    - “provisioned..” --> “provisioned.” (extra period)
>    - “Acknowledgements” --> “Acknowledgments”
>    - “capabilites” --> “capabilities”
>    - “the the” --> “the”
>
>
>