[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42

Henning Rogge via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 07 December 2020 07:48 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Henning Rogge via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: roll@ietf.org, draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160732731736.8235.16552518300256123704@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 23:48:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/O_K49mAusBGkruydCtCiam8DuTs>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42

Reviewer: Henning Rogge
Review result: Ready

Hello,

the Rtgdir asked me again to review the draft "useofrplinfo" (last review I did
was for draft 25). Please note that I do NOT follow the ROLL WG.

The draft has made a huge step forward in readability compared to last year.

The extended terminology section helps a lot to understand the document.
All the figures/tables have been cleaned up considerably and they all use the
"Figure" term instead a mixture of figures and tables. Abbreviations are also
used more consistently, which both helps with the table cleanup and the
readability in general.

I think draft 42 resolves the issues I had in my earlier review.

Henning Rogge

[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-r… Henning Rogge via Datatracker