Re: [RTG-DIR] Harmful consequences of Postel's principle

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 07 May 2019 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FD512018B; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geEn1w2PxtBe; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2919912018A; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x47GgU3I025919; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:42:30 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14892203B; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:42:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C592E2203D; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:42:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.228.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x47GgSvI011337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 May 2019 17:42:29 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A'" <db3546@att.com>, <rtg-chairs@ietf.org>, <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C89F02443C@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C89F02443C@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 17:42:29 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0a5a01d504f3$dc7421a0$955c64e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQK+iyhptHxOCSaq3th8upRvOvmhu6SM0IUA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.228.68
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24598.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.360-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.360-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24598.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.359600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: byfwvk+IcRnxIbpQ8BhdbDPDkSOzeDWWfkuZtv/FS5rBQmthaZij0yUc tKY3q+Ds49bJrkN9wqz5fokVQYpSF7NFdXOVxOU0lVHM/F6YkvSq+eA48cLTbrrfxlRjqBJ3YdZ pj+WManpCnLVdVwWGHqsnHA/NdMElc3eYMKyaPySiVU7u7I4INQGZ/+APXW9k7icOyA4624b6dy zF+dpAW4jtXTM4ySGxAH+13/h3Btf3gr9T3KhP3gizXxlOHX34GSqdEmeD/nUBOMBsCslSyND1S FVeE0DsdtSe/JWsGJIxDeoOGIeZ79CzEk+/JINjYx1jPJKy+Dy7bm4onsHlrmjliw+xvItdYUUc TJLR9ZNR4kuXOqRTp3/inirn0Q3sMHsCEB6xhyOpRKRclM3X830tCKdnhB581B0Hk1Q1KyJcRgd 0HR6VpXQdJ7XfU86eOwBXM346/+xHa2vINb/8qpTlAF7hn4iUeAROcfTLc4JkXqP0GQis0lxTs2 4ELAGW
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/RBjHrsBuRvsj0-kzUdlFeS8EekM>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Harmful consequences of Postel's principle
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 16:42:39 -0000

I read it some time ago. 

I am in no way convinced that publishing this in the IAB stream is in any way going to have a positive impact on the way protocols are designed or on the image of the IETF.

It left me remembering that the Internet routes around errors. So I am also not so worried about that IAB publishing it. 

It is also possible that the authors do not completely understand the robustness principle.

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3546@att.com> 
Sent: 07 May 2019 17:11
To: rtg-chairs@ietf.org; rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Harmful consequences of Postel's principle

Hi,

Not sure if this document caught your attention as I think it is a bit of a misnomer for the title. The IAB are looking to publish it as an IAB document.

I'm going to comment on it as I think to make a generic statement that Postel's principle is harmful is harmful.

Interested in your thoughts-
Deborah


-----Original Message-----
From: IAB <iab-bounces@iab.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 10:40 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: iab@iab.org
Subject: [IAB] I-D Action: draft-iab-protocol-maintenance-03.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Architecture Board IETF of the IETF.

        Title           : The Harmful Consequences of the Robustness Principle
        Author          : Martin Thomson
	Filename        : draft-iab-protocol-maintenance-03.txt
	Pages           : 11
	Date            : 2019-05-06

Abstract:
   Jon Postel's famous statement of "Be liberal in what you accept, and
   conservative in what you send" is a principle that has long guided
   the design and implementation of Internet protocols.  The posture
   this statement advocates promotes interoperability in the short term,
   but can negatively affect the protocol ecosystem over time.  For a
   protocol that is actively maintained, the robustness principle can,
   and should, be avoided.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Diab-2Dprotocol-2Dmaintenance_&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=VZUxXboWY44rtZcmcswiLQuQ8TmW6g7F7Azgl-j0amw&s=Fxp9wRoCVRJ_8BZBzY1MoExjRlVCegLbFtq8txcr6F8&e=

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Diab-2Dprotocol-2Dmaintenance-2D03&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=VZUxXboWY44rtZcmcswiLQuQ8TmW6g7F7Azgl-j0amw&s=aCbWfZ2WFHlTnh7WeiI8hJ_N04EoyW90y-Wuml8gLuA&e=
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_html_draft-2Diab-2Dprotocol-2Dmaintenance-2D03&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=VZUxXboWY44rtZcmcswiLQuQ8TmW6g7F7Azgl-j0amw&s=lBVwS9yzx9lBmBEMA0cIidmh_hgRqGFclGMt6iNTPfw&e=

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_rfcdiff-3Furl2-3Ddraft-2Diab-2Dprotocol-2Dmaintenance-2D03&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=VZUxXboWY44rtZcmcswiLQuQ8TmW6g7F7Azgl-j0amw&s=JdV3Cux54CLr3GLrhc4SapVMu0mBchg-65xKrwqYPCo&e=


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=ftp-3A__ftp.ietf.org_internet-2Ddrafts_&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=VZUxXboWY44rtZcmcswiLQuQ8TmW6g7F7Azgl-j0amw&s=FA3-28RGBPX6oeQnIR42NBpfekSVh-BU7wyHCkuesdA&e=