Re: [RTG-DIR] [v6ops] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDAE130DC5; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y8gIF55O3lVW; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CF071277D2; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id y20-v6so23364355lfy.0; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iSPXT4k4DX6a8eyH1H8KONIrFp041Qqj1XG1avi0BPo=; b=mnJv0Kk0F5nxJksgqNYSmJxOFH8IBAVSHpS/Pgve8c0x2Iv5mFGnF9WrsmlhdQXJv0 PpgHh2ig7VCBcL0/xJr4NjgxSS5dUJnVWwA1PnG/LRyHtwpbsJZQIAduoPHkReZ+jffK 4egqe5+plPBRAXDXk4ak3zNCn6QEW49o2rQk9r1qs6Z5KuNGvo0w7Wjpg7ViLofqMaF1 l9T/X9YyTWoeCgn+MmoxO5aMYu9DXlCW2QSwM8VTc2U82C17RaEwhuIst+3fMUlGSboe 8pqVUNcHyJYzKu096xdIfcFLgLrZqB96bVY3WE+7x/YoZ+H3k9fxRSv03lFR8DrCOcGr vNMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iSPXT4k4DX6a8eyH1H8KONIrFp041Qqj1XG1avi0BPo=; b=uMd/KH+l+hkjwPlWyPq4vEV1/zWq6/8k84c7coX3cvYRXBlyWv47CigPQ4s7m5AYrw UVmoIyt0bcgnV6bFNHXMvoqJeTAQ8iVlX2vNE82aIHw95svg9om9KBgaxYSON1k9U5CL nFgrX40Oo4xEOd3239llEyTHJcqo8CX4+kmYW8WggWG4DZAK1I4f8n92d6D2eEoTd7Pg b0g3fh1bFIKWHGpGFlDNkF7Il9nGbw3WkddPXx5FmuQeM2xIk+vipfTv1QYAJivrkn9y WWJ911VPWS3T9cVFSjsV+p7OWbzxNmeBTMvDM8Ohafzy7cvc5r3wiYgsOfAqBTZCfyvd AS9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1GmPBve46RiLKd3D8aT+F3Qv1HY/tvzVMXMlq5d40PDiKeEvEd 2aRSDdHUUtORPo+dQb/URVOcDCP1VWU5Ad7yz3EB43JV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKL8cUI2RmF0iLc2nMq+t6u/F9CnWsGpQtT4zwxOhMSBkoFlDEo2tXIf2JFaGH+4LMR3m0nNg3WK2sIUgs9KwNQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:e21b:: with SMTP id z27-v6mr1363672lfg.119.1529311085310; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a19:1dd0:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR05MB3200E0E4D1B0D2CEA098D169AB950@MWHPR05MB3200.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MWHPR05MB3200E0E4D1B0D2CEA098D169AB950@MWHPR05MB3200.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:37:44 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQbee9owdz_oN2uXvX1hKY0j5jbRmpH8QeWQrhHuuqDkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net>
Cc: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/Tuw9Ws4_lOxKcSOTUbSIwujhPc8>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] [v6ops] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:38:10 -0000

Hi Ravi,

My apologies for the delay with addressing issues you raised in your review!
I've just uploaded -05 version,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras/
please let me know if it still has any issues.

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net> wrote:
> Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras
> Summary: This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to publication.
>
> Nits:
>    d. Section 3.2.3: typo: quoted section # needs correction.
>           " correct uplink based on the source address as described in Section 3.2.1."
>            ->
>          "correct uplink based on the source address as described in Section 3.1.1."

The reference was actually correct, I've updated the wording to make
it more clear.

> 4. Section 3.3 & 3.4: the text seems to indicate that this draft if proposing some solution, even though as indicated in this draft's abstract….the solution being referenced is in ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming and this draft if describing the use of that solution in sample scenarios. Slight rewording of text should help to address this.

I've updated the abstract and the Introduction section to clarify that
this draft  provides a solution based on the general approach
discussed in ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming.

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry