[RTG-DIR]Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 02 September 2024 04:56 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172525300265.981632.9152324606577036628@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 21:56:42 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: L25RS5Q4Z6XKKQFSU3SRX7C5VZULOQUX
CC: ccamp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Reply-To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Subject: [RTG-DIR]Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/U9G4pE1TPz_Dsmnpvzgf73B87HI>

Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed the latest version 11 of
the draft.  Many thanks to the authors in updating RFC 9193.

AFAIK I believe in this case a BIS to RFC 9193 was the correct path taken to
fix all the Layer 0 data types that were missing in RFC 9193. Nicely done and
very thorough work done by the authors and all contributors.

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
None

Nits:
None

[RTG-DIR]Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-cc… Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
[RTG-DIR]Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-iet… Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare)
[RTG-DIR]回复: Rtgdir last call review of draft-iet… Zhenghaomian